Dailymaverick logo

Opinionistas

This article is an Opinion, which presents the writer’s personal point of view. The views expressed are those of the author/authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Daily Maverick.

This article is more than a year old

Letter from DC — 22 days to go before Trump-Kamala showdown, no fingernails left to bite

As the US election enters the home straight, the happy vibes of Vice-President Kamala Harris’s late entry into the race are being tempered by a feeling of dread that a brainsick nutcase could, in three weeks, be re-elected leader of the most powerful country in the world.

The race remains a dead heat, with the seven states – Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada and Arizona – that will decide the electoral college all within the margin of error. It could be that the polls have tightened thanks to an avalanche of partisan Republican surveys, but there is now a full-blown freakout and an epidemic of sleeplessness in liberal America.

The Harris campaign has done most things right, including trashing Trump in their sole debate, rolling out a policy agenda in double quick time that is exponentially more coherent than Trump’s, assembling a coalition that extends from the Alexandria Ocasio Cortez left of the Democratic Party to former Republicans like Dick and Liz Cheney, and projecting positive energy and hope for the future.

But as he has done since he came down the Trump Tower “golden” escalator in 2015, Trump continues to suck up most of the attention.

(As Pete Buttigieg eloquently described it in May 2020, he understands why people and the media are “mesmerized” by Trump’s tweets because “it is the nature of grotesque things that you can’t look away”. – Ed)


In recent weeks, Trump has gone full fascist, deploying extreme rhetoric against immigrants who he has labelled “animals” and rapists released from dungeons and mental asylums to slash the throats of hard-working Americans. He wants to execute those who repeatedly enter the US illegally.

On Saturday, Trump travelled to Coachella in the middle of California to declare that the US was “under occupation” and he would “liberate” it from “the enemy within”. This included “all the scum that we have to deal with that hate our country”.

Trump, threatening his critics with retribution, revenge and jail, wants to sic the military and the national guard on his own countrymen who he sees as bigger enemies than China or Russia.

“Kamala’s reign of terror ends the day I am elected. She is finished.”

Anyone who has been around long enough knows that this is the real Trump, and that a second term, without the minimal guardrails of the first, should scare the hell out of everyone, not just Americans.

According to the new book by Bob Woodward, General Mark Milley, the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, believes his former commander-in-chief is a “fascist to the core” and “the most dangerous person ever”.

The journalist Aaron Rupar who has covered all of Trump’s major speeches this year has witnessed the rhetoric growing darker and darker: 

“Trump’s closing message is a full blown hate campaign against black and brown people. Historians will look back in astonishment that this terrifying reality wasn’t the subject of wall to wall coverage and commentary in weeks leading up to this election. He’s not hiding anything.”


Through all the madness Trump continues to chase fast bucks. He is not even trying to hide his crypto scams, while continuing to hawk $100,000 watches and “Trump bibles” that, it now transpires, were made in China.

“This is his superpower,” the comedian Bill Maher exclaimed almost in admiration. “You don’t even notice the insanity because it’s so ubiquitous.”

Trump’s bet is that while his crazed rhetoric is too radical for suburban middle-of-the-road voters – who are being blitzed with hundreds of millions of dollars in anti-Harris television ads – he is reaching out to mostly apolitical young men who haven’t made up their minds yet.

He is hoping to rile up the Gen Z “manosphere” who are struggling to get ahead and feel society is privileging women. The campaign hopes to turn out enough of them to compensate for the sizeable number of Republicans – more than a third of those who supported Trump’s main challenger Nikki Haley in the primaries – who say they will vote for Harris.

Even some young black men are Trump-curious, and Barack Obama had sharp words for these “brothers” at a rally in Pennsylvania last week: “Part of it makes me think that you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president, and you’re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for that,” he scolded.

It is hard to envisage the puffy, orange-faced old croaker with a ridiculous comb-over as a manly model for the bros. Rumours about incontinence spread on social media this weekend after he appeared to fart loudly during an appearance in Detroit.

His declining mental acuity finally made it on to the pages of the ultra-cautious New York Times last week (“Trump’s Speeches, Increasingly Angry and Rambling, Reignite the Question of Age”).

Elon Musk


But Trump does have a more than adequate stand-in – the South African-born oligarch Elon Musk who brings the brio that the 78-year-old may lack.

Musk, whose postings on X, the platform that he owns, are generally shallow, crude and often false, is viewed as a hero and a genius by a generation of young men who would like to be as rich, as powerful and as successful with the opposite sex as he is.

He is like a weirdo version of Bruce Wayne aka Batman, with his cool hi-tech cars and his phallic spaceships, a caped avenger coming to rescue Gotham from wokedom. (Not for nothing has his essentially undriveable Tesla truck been renamed the Incel Camino.)

Polls show that young men are more likely to be influenced by Musk’s endorsement of Trump than young women are by Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Harris. At the Coachella rally this weekend, the crowd spontaneously started chanting “E-lon, E-lon”, perhaps hoping that their great hero would emerge and frolic joyfully in the air as he did at a rally in Pennsylvania the previous week.

Musk is busily attempting to buy the election for Trump with money and lies. He has spent up to $180-million on his America PAC and has even moved to Pennsylvania to oversee Trump’s field campaign in the most critical battleground state.

He has rallied other billionaires behind Trump, and turned X into a cheerleader for the campaign, in return for which he has been promised a lead role in running and cutting the government down to size – like he did, disastrously, with X.

Abuse of truth


Trump’s actual running mate, the unlikeable JD Vance, appears to have been eased out into becoming the face of the campaign on mainstream television where he is doomed to endlessly evade the question of whether Trump lost the 2020 election.

What Musk and Trump share, apart from their egotistical and narcissistic personalities, is an aggressive abuse of the truth. And they are both driven by an insatiable desire to win at all costs.

Does Kamala Harris have what it takes to overcome this ultimate alliance of male entitlement? If she falls to the same fate as Hillary Clinton, will a major US party ever nominate a woman for president again?

Harris is being urged to be more assertive about who she is, more willing to break with her boss, President Joe Biden, and to play to her biggest strength – that she is not Donald Trump.

The New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd complained on Sunday that Harris wasn’t doing enough: “Where is the fierce urgency of beating Donald Trump?”

Campaign spokespeople are calling for calm, saying they expect the race to be neck and neck up until election day. They are resisting any urge to raise expectations, remembering how crushing it was when these were dashed when Hillary Clinton lost to Trump in 2016.

But some of the first glimpses at early voting, including vote by mail, show surprising strength for the Democrats. In Pennsylvania, according to Tom Bonier, a veteran Democratic strategist, the turnout by black women is 248 % of what it was in 2020.

Is this what we’re in for? Will black women, historically the most disenfranchised of Americans, be at the forefront of saving democracy again? DM

Comments

Malcolm McManus Oct 14, 2024, 07:05 AM

We need just one balanced article on this election. The basic Anti Trump, Pro Harris bias is getting rather long in the tooth. Can we at least have some level headed opinion on Kamala. She is a rather weak candidate. Its not all good. Although I am no fan of Trump, some of the opinion is way off.

Derek Taylor Oct 14, 2024, 08:17 AM

Agree

MT Wessels Oct 14, 2024, 09:34 AM

The author is expressing his views (OPINIONISTA). It was cognitively not pretending to be NEWS. Partisan yes, yet all he says is objectively correct. So by "balanced" you wish him to also raise comparative concerns about Harris, even if that means a more subjective attack absent objective fact?

Ed Rybicki Oct 14, 2024, 09:49 AM

What you said

Malcolm McManus Oct 14, 2024, 10:07 AM

It is my opinion that the writer has biased views. Surely if he writes an opinion, we may comment, in response. We all know its his opinion. Opinions are not always based on fact, or if they are, leaving out facts that don't support his bias, is not overly helpful to anyone, including himself.

Andrew Mortimer Oct 14, 2024, 09:42 AM

This is an Op-Ed also know as an Opinion Piece not a news article reporting on facts. Malcolm you have a lot to say in support of Trump. Why don't you write an Op-Ed on why you support Trump. Im sure if it was eloquently written it would be published. Some couch reading for right wingers...

Roke Wood Oct 19, 2024, 12:07 PM

Drivel! as an opinion piece its so blatantly lob-sided it smacks of desperation. one may think that someone with as much experience as the author has, he would not stoop so low as to launch a personal attack on trump or any presidential candidate. it would’ve been funny if it wasn’t so pathetic.

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 07:18 AM

This is just woke, socialist propaganda. Group politics, an oppressing white male class that needs saving by a group of black women with a healthy dose of vitriol and anger to boot. I know it's an opinion piece, but really, this is just hate speech and massively anti-democratic communism.

Ed Rybicki Oct 14, 2024, 09:51 AM

What lens are you reading that article through? “Massively anti-democratic socialism”?? Do you even know what that is? Definitely not hate speech; just a well-written OPINION PIECE with which many of us agree wholeheartedly.

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 10:03 AM

And many of us don't. What's your point?

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 10:11 AM

Kamala has said repeatedly she wants to tax high earners way more than they are now, because they have the money and it is incumbent on them to 'pay back to society'. This was postulated by Marx as a strategy in both his great works. What is your view on that?

Kanu Sukha Oct 14, 2024, 12:18 PM

It works .. and the 'west' is shit scared of it because it would undermine all the imagined 'progress' they have made over centuries of imperialism & colonialism. And in cases like some European countries actually implemented it without acknowledgement ! How is that for plagiarism ?

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 03:11 PM

Well I'm aware of the effect of democratic socialism on Sweden. They have had no net job creation since the 50s, and have less money now than they did then. Healthcare and other metrics are all in decline. Venezuela is another example. Not sure I understand your point?

John P Oct 14, 2024, 10:21 AM

Anything that is not hard right is woke n your opinion?

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 10:30 AM

"Will black women, historically the most disenfranchised of Americans, be at the forefront of saving democracy again?" Yeah, that's pretty woke. A group, an assertion of wrongdoing, the 'oppressor' narrative and other points, but yeah. Tell me why it isn't?

John P Oct 14, 2024, 11:51 AM

You are cherry picking one line from the article which anyway does not negate my original statement.

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 12:10 PM

It is the gentleman's closing statement. I consider this article woke, in the main, due to this statement. I can cherry pick others if you'd like? But the more I cherry pick the more it will make the whole article sound this way.

John P Oct 14, 2024, 11:51 AM

You are cherry picking one line from the article which anyway does not negate my original statement.

Phillip Van Niekerk Oct 14, 2024, 01:42 PM

So if almost all white men had not been able to vote until 1965, and all but one of the 46 presidents since since 1789 had been black women, you would not regard white men as historically disenfranchised?

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 02:18 PM

I don't mind if you want to use the 'oppressive patriarchy' argument. I think it's a weak argument, but one you're welcome to make. I think it was birth control and practical solutions to menstruation, in the middle part of last century, but either way, it is a 'woke' politics argument.

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 02:22 PM

I believe it was two white men in their middle aged professional careers who pioneered the use of medical birth control precisely for this reason.

tooth Oct 14, 2024, 07:19 AM

Does it really matter who runs the uniparty plutocracy?

dexmoodl Oct 14, 2024, 08:55 AM

To us in SA , not much , based on what policy policy positions is available between the two , Trump may be marginally better for us and Africa.

Kanu Sukha Oct 14, 2024, 12:10 PM

Correct. Increasingly erratic genocide Joe keeps sending his nemesis more & more weapons & does not 'know' if BB (trump mirror) is trying to 'sway' the US elections! LOL. Kamala no different ! Americans have learnt nothing from botched Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan disasters - to name a few only.

Pierre Durand Oct 14, 2024, 06:05 PM

Very much agree with u. All just variations on a theme

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 07:27 AM

Naked assertions, no discussion on actual policy, accusations without evidence. This dude would get so badly owned in any debate it's kind of scary. The real question is do we now agree that the DM is clearly in support of it?

Ed Rybicki Oct 14, 2024, 09:52 AM

No-one is making you read the DM.

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 10:14 AM

So you agree. Thanks Ed.

John P Oct 14, 2024, 10:23 AM

The article is about Trump and Musk and quotes Trump and Musk. These are not assertions, it is what they actually say.

louw.nic Oct 14, 2024, 12:09 PM

At least, this piece is styled as "opinion"; and not paid for (and written?) by some obscure "foundation", which has unknown or unclear sources of funding and goals that read like posters at an ivy-league university protest.

Phillip Van Niekerk Oct 14, 2024, 02:04 PM

I am happy to debate anytime. But if you look at a Trump rally you would know that he is not running on any serious "policy". I would be curious to know how you defend fascism, industrial scale lying, and the scapegoating of immigrants.

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 02:30 PM

I don't want to defend any of those things. I'm happy to defend and motivate my capitalist ideas though? I believe we are all equal, should be seen as individuals with individual value and worth, everyone ... I believe the law should support and motivate people being the best they can be. etc.

Phillip Van Niekerk Oct 14, 2024, 02:59 PM

Then show some respect for how the Biden-Harris administration pulled the US out of the depths of the pandemic recession to be one of the best performing economies in the world. Trump's contribution will be tax cuts for the super-wealthy, and hatred and division on a scale we have never seen.

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 03:24 PM

How so? Inflation reached a 40 year high in mid-2022 and hasn't scaled back to much degree, despite best efforts. The debt is incorrigible and growing, and her policies seem to indicate increased borrowing over the medium term. But none of this has anything to do with 'woke' group politics...

Phillip Van Niekerk Oct 14, 2024, 04:28 PM

Inflation is at 2.4 % without a recession and the fed is lowering interest rates. There is near full employment, and the deficit is manageable if you tax the ultra-rich and corporates who are paying zero. The Dow is at record levels. But yeah, most white people are voting for Trump.

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 04:39 PM

Their grocery index indicates a 25% increase in grocery prices? You can make of this what you will, but I suspect people of all colours and persuasions are concerned about that. Yet you insist on making it racial and saying 'but most white people'? This is the concern we have dude. Address that.

Phillip Van Niekerk Oct 14, 2024, 05:11 PM

Identity politics in the US, like in SA, started out with white men excluding everybody else. They are still on top thanks to generational wealth and powerful connections, not the free market. Many white people, like black people, still choose to vote with their group not for the best policies.

Phillip Van Niekerk Oct 14, 2024, 05:20 PM

Food prices in the US rose by 2.3% in the year ending September. The US has consistently had the lowest inflation of all the G7 countries. The good news is that wage growth has consistently outpaced inflation: it was 4.6 % in August.

John P Oct 14, 2024, 06:40 PM

Time to look outside that echo chamber and stop quoting the nonsense economic figures below which are straight out of the Trump bulldust factory. The US economy is currently healthier than it was in the Trump years. Next thing you will be telling us China will have to pay the duties Trump wants.

Malcolm McManus Oct 14, 2024, 07:34 AM

Although the election appears very close, I am sensing signs of panic and desperation amongst the dems and Kamala faction. Even Obama intervened and ended up offending black American brothers. His comments have outraged many black American men who aren't feeling the same love or support for dems.

Skinyela Oct 14, 2024, 07:57 AM

By calling musk an oligarch you suggest that he is no selfmade billionaire, but benefited from state resources just like the Russian oligarchs.

Johann Conradie Oct 14, 2024, 09:20 AM

It's almost like the writer does not know the meaning of oligarch?

Andrew Mortimer Oct 14, 2024, 09:33 AM

He did, read up on how he made his money off state contracts....

Skinyela Oct 14, 2024, 09:59 AM

There's a difference between rendering services to government or selling goods to the government, and getting subsidies. He did business with the government, not got free handouts from the government.

Rodney Weidemann Oct 14, 2024, 12:24 PM

You clearly haven't done your research - both Space X and Tesla have received hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies...

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 12:47 PM

They're making electric cars and globally accessible internet. What's your point?

MT Wessels Oct 14, 2024, 09:41 AM

Oligarch: a rich person who has massive political influence. It is a universal concept, not unique to the Russian case use (which does refer to state-linked wealth). Oh, and yes, Musk has enjoyed massive state contacts and benefitted from enabling subsidies, all with fair reasoning.

Harold Porter Oct 14, 2024, 08:14 AM

Great! Another fair, neutral and insightful article that endeavors to do justice to both sides.

Andrew Mortimer Oct 14, 2024, 09:37 AM

Its an Opinion Piece or Op-Ed not an article reporting on facts. It doesn't need to do justice to both sides. It provides a view from one point of view...

Malcolm McManus Oct 14, 2024, 10:21 AM

All commentators here have opinions and a voice on this platform. They don't have to agree with one sided biased opinions/articles and may comment accordingly. Alternate opinions. No harm done.

Wilhelm van Rooyen Oct 14, 2024, 08:16 AM

Almost as bad as The Guardian. Lopsided, and factually incorrect in places. Harris campaign actually recently raised vastly larger sums than Trump. There's only one question to answer: If Trump is this orange faced, comb-over, etc farting MONSTER, then why are about 50% of Amercans voting for him?

Skinyela Oct 14, 2024, 09:26 AM

They're afraid to face that question, they rather insult people and call them names like dumb-Magameniacs. If humanity built an inclusive world, especially economically, after the WWII why are so many people attracted to 'fascist' ideas?

John P Oct 14, 2024, 10:25 AM

We could ask the same question re the EFF and MKP in our own country

Gavrel A Oct 14, 2024, 11:07 AM

That's a good question. Maybe, because he represents them?

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 11:32 AM

How do you figure that Trump has any political interest in socialism?

Mortimer Lee Oct 15, 2024, 11:37 AM

Simple question .... simple answer: because that "about 50%" represents the most brazenly pigheaded members of a terminally afflicted society ... where social-media superficiality, shallow consumer-'culture', and keeping-up-with-the-Joneses-at-all-costs, all combine to obliterate human worth.

ozinsky Oct 14, 2024, 08:36 AM

Cheney supporting Harris is a plus for her campaign? He is a war monger who led the lie that there was link between Iraq and Al-Qaeeda. The wars he started devastated Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan and led to the rise of the Houtis & ISIS. If Harris is proud of a fascist like Cheney what is she?

Ed Rybicki Oct 14, 2024, 09:54 AM

The point is not that Harris is “proud” of either Cheney: the point is that, right-wing Republicans as they are, they cannot stand the shallowness and incoherence of Donald Trump. THAT should tell you something!

ozinsky Oct 14, 2024, 10:39 AM

More likely is that Harris is a war monger just like Cheney & they have made common ground. Biden and Harris' record shows this. Trump as an outsider to the Washington system threatens their perpetual wars. Which war did Biden/Harris end? At least Trump forced the withdrawal from Afghanistan.

louw.nic Oct 14, 2024, 12:11 PM

Thank you for pointing this out, Max.

MT Wessels Oct 14, 2024, 07:56 PM

Woosh! So....Ozinsky for Trump then? You do know that there is no 3rd choice of perfect candidate available, that it is a binary choice?

Mortimer Lee Oct 14, 2024, 09:00 AM

The most frightening aspect of the Trumpian 'reality' fomented within a very sick-and-twisted USA .... is how attractive that lunacy is to dumb- and-dumber across the world. The comments from all these Trump- apologists really sicken me - and show why articles with "balance" are wasted on fools.

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 09:49 AM

So you're 'sickened' by people who disagree with you? Or are you 'sickened' by people who don't like group politics and socialism. Balance me Mortimer?

Mortimer Lee Oct 14, 2024, 12:24 PM

It was your Trumpelite contingent calling for "balanced articles" ... Johnny-Bravo-Not. I would not lower myself to debate concepts like 'group politics' or 'socialism' with anyone that can actually find valid motivation for considering Trump ... the man .... to be presidential material.

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 12:49 PM

Thanks. I'll let that comment hold it's own.

Muishond X Oct 14, 2024, 09:11 AM

One cannot shy away from the fact that Kamala failed to articulate, on more than one occassion, how her policies would differ from the failed foreign policies, failed immigration policies and failed economic policies of her predescessor Joe Biden! Phil, who is the brainsick nutcase here?

Steve Chia Oct 14, 2024, 09:14 AM

Harris might be a fairly weak candidate, but she will not bring divisiveness, polarity, chaos, and, yes, fascism, to the world's most powerful nation and thereby to the world at large. Trump WILL bring all this. He already has but it will be much worse now. How anyone can vote for him is beyond me.

Muishond X Oct 14, 2024, 10:04 AM

One cannot shy away from the fact that Kamala failed to articulate, on more than one occassion, how her policies would differ from the failed foreign policies, failed immigration policies and failed economic policies of her predescessor Joe Biden!

John P Oct 14, 2024, 10:28 AM

Perhaps because they are not actually failed policies?

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 10:17 AM

Disagree. Her penchant for group politics and socialism will do the exact opposite. This article and it's anger towards another group of people (based on their group identity) being a great example.

Malcolm McManus Oct 14, 2024, 10:31 AM

Harris brings nothing more than what she brought in the Biden Harris presidency. A presidency that reigned down a far worse standard of living for the American people than Trump did. No evidence of him being a fascist.

louw.nic Oct 14, 2024, 12:13 PM

Perhaps, because no-one voted for her? Ms. Harris received EXACTLY ZERO Primary votes, if i recall correctly. She is being installed as a "useful idiot", just like Biden (who was never in charge of his own faculties, let alone the USA).

Harold Porter Oct 14, 2024, 12:26 PM

Did you know that under his presidency, the real-terms wealth of the poorest 10% of Americans increased for the first time in 50 years?...that's one possible reason why people might wish to vote for him.

Karl Sittlinger Oct 14, 2024, 09:50 AM

You guys on the hard left still don't get it: shaming and insulting voters of your opposition does not work. Hillary Clinton had to find that out the hard way with her "deplorables" speech, which many agree led to her loss against Trump. 300 chars DM? A prelude to cut comments all together?

Karl Sittlinger Oct 14, 2024, 10:04 AM

Instead of insulting Trump voters (Which clearly leads to defensiveness and more extreme madness) maybe you should listen to their fears, especially those on the center right. What's driving them to vote for Trump in spite of his lies, racism and fear mongering?

Karl Sittlinger Oct 14, 2024, 11:28 AM

I urge those on the hard left to read the article "Here’s Why We Shouldn’t Demean Trump Voters" found at the New York Times.

MT Wessels Oct 14, 2024, 08:07 PM

I read that article and no, there is no deep meaning. Self-harm it is and will be, due to a limited, ignorant worldview. And the selective "deplorables" comment that got blown out of context - you did get that, didn't you? - they were never gonna vote for her anyway. The truth just hurt.

Karl Sittlinger Oct 15, 2024, 01:15 AM

What I get is that some people are so impressed by their own opinion, they wouldn't even consider any others.

Karl Sittlinger Oct 15, 2024, 08:40 AM

"In her 2017 book What Happened, Clinton herself said that her comments on the "basket of deplorables" were a factor in her electoral loss." But hey, you know better than Clinton herself I assume? Forgive me if I will take her word over yours.

Karl Sittlinger Oct 14, 2024, 10:04 AM

Instead of insulting Trump voters (Which clearly leads to defensiveness and more extreme madness) maybe you should listen to their fears, especially those on the center right. What's driving them to vote for Trump in spite of his lies, racism and fear mongering?

Malcolm McManus Oct 14, 2024, 11:42 AM

I think whats driving voters towards Trump, is simply knowing how little Harris has done over the last 4 years and not knowing what shes all about. There is simply no substance to her answers on the few interviews she has done. Question and answer sessions are what voters watch. Not so much rallies

Karl Sittlinger Oct 14, 2024, 12:05 PM

Read the article I mention in the duplicate comment above. I think there is much truth to it.

Phillip Van Niekerk Oct 14, 2024, 03:04 PM

Funny how the Maga lot accuse liberals of being snowflakes but when they are called out for the venom and hatred they spew, they are suddenly all hurt and fragile.

Karl Sittlinger Oct 14, 2024, 03:41 PM

Sounds a bit like you are cutting your own nose off to spite. It doesn't matter who is a snowflake here, what matters is that Trump loses. It is exactly your kind of comment that turns away the moderate voters near the center that actually don't spew venom and hatred.

Phillip Van Niekerk Oct 14, 2024, 04:33 PM

Many moderate Republicans are actually voting for Harris because they can't stomach Trump. The US, like SA, needs a multi party system, which is exactly what Trump and Maga is destroying. And, no, I don't have sympathy for angry people with million dollar houses who want to burn the system down.

Karl Sittlinger Oct 14, 2024, 04:47 PM

You are putting all the Trump voters in the same category (including black and latina males) and by doing that you are failing to see those whose opinions could change away from Trump. Your own hate and prejudice is clearly a factor here. Read the article I quote in one of my responses.

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 04:12 PM

Why do you insist on referring to people in 'groups' and making assumptions about them based on that?

Richard Kennard Oct 14, 2024, 04:14 PM

Reading down the flurry of comments one gets the distinct impression that MAGA has arrived on our shores...assuming of course that the bulk of commentators here are Saffers?

MT Wessels Oct 14, 2024, 08:00 PM

Yep. To be more precise: older, white, male Saffers. The "I'm not a racist but..." crowd projecting their own values him and seeing a mirror. They love them some Trump despite what his presidency will mean for SA, because their schadenfreude will make up for the ZAR sinking.

endorest Oct 14, 2024, 10:27 AM

Now I understand why Democrats have blocked all applications (24 million) of would-be legal immigrants from Western Europe and advanced Asian states and have thrown the doors wide open to illegal immigrants from Mexico. They are deporting them to the swinging states, wchiche will not swing any more.

endorest Oct 14, 2024, 10:40 AM

Why have the brightest minds who used to support and fund the Left in the US and UK converted into the Right in the last 4 years? JK Rowling, E. Musk, Jordan Peterson, Matt Walsh, Robert F. Kennedy Jr, Rowan Atkinson, M. Shellenberger Ricky Gervais, Winston Marshall, Tulsi Gabbard, Bill Maher .

John P Oct 14, 2024, 01:53 PM

Out of that list Musk & RFK support Trump. Matt Walsh is a right wing blogger & never supported the left. Rowling has anti transgender views but otherwise supports labour, Peterson is anti transgender, Atkinson is pro free speech & against PC language. I don't see "converted to the right"

Knowledgeispower RSA Oct 14, 2024, 10:48 AM

Philip, sadly you are suffering from the most extreme case of Trump derangement syndrome I have ever seen...and I am extremely widely read on the American election. This is illustrated by your unbelievably blinkered bias, your ad hominem attacks, your ugly vitriol, your ignorance of so many facts..

alastairmgf Oct 14, 2024, 12:00 PM

Quite right, it’s not even funny. Just plain nasty. But I’ve noticed that a lot from Harris supporters. Trump supporters seldom make personal attacks on Harris preferring to point out her intellectual and policy weakness. Harris supporters stoop to ad hominem attacks. It’s all they have got.

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 12:17 PM

Apparently it's 'sickening' to them when we ask what Harris intends to do re: corporate tax increases and how point out she said nothing, has no clue what is being asked and seems to not have a clear policy and plan. We 'sicken' them by asking these things.

Rodney Weidemann Oct 14, 2024, 03:29 PM

Well it's certainly NOT ad hominem to refer to the republiKKKan candidate as a bully, a convicted fraudster and a serial (and convicted) sexual abuser - he sounds just like the perfect candidate to lead the so-called 'greatest nation on earth'...

John P Oct 15, 2024, 01:49 PM

Trump does all the personal attacks on Harris directly, he doesn't need his supporters to chime in.

Craig King Oct 14, 2024, 11:05 AM

Quoting Aaron Rupar, one of the most dishonest journalists in the US, is a bit of an own goal. He cooked up the "fine people on both sides hoax" with his selectively edited video which despite being comprehensively debunked is still used by both Biden and Harris when attacking Trump.

alastairmgf Oct 14, 2024, 11:06 AM

We all know it’s an opinion piece. It does not make it any more palatable. The vitriol emanating from the writer is unseemly. Democrats have become the party of the elite, Republicans the middle and working class. What a polar shift. Harris has no real policy and is inarticulate.

T'Plana Hath Oct 14, 2024, 11:17 AM

I've seen less projection in an IMAX theatre! Dial down the invective and maybe speak to a scientist before you say something stupid like, "phallic spaceships" ...

Denise Smit Oct 14, 2024, 11:31 AM

This article sounds like poisoned sour grapes that is going to land on the wrong plate, to me.

dbrosdurb Oct 14, 2024, 01:18 PM

The God King will return

Lisbeth Scalabrini Oct 14, 2024, 01:47 PM

Forget Harris against Trump and try to imagine the world if Trump wins. He will most likely break all commercial agreements with the rest of the world. He said he would call in the army to fight "the enemies inside" i.e. everybody with a centre of left opinion.

Pierre Durand Oct 14, 2024, 01:48 PM

Jeepers remind me to never read articles labeled opinionistas again. Won't matter who wins. The slide is inevitabl. if the argument is that one side causes more suffering than the other. No not true. Just changes the victims. If Harris wins it's these groups who suffer. If Trump wins its those

Lisbeth Scalabrini Oct 14, 2024, 01:53 PM

Trump will send the National Guard to the border and get rid of the " (They are all) murderers, rapers and thieves trying to enter the country": his words. He is a fascist to the bone!

Malcolm McManus Oct 14, 2024, 03:09 PM

And so he should. Many people who now proudly call themselves Americans came to America the right way. They adhered to the legal processes involved. In most civilized countries, borders are strictly controlled for good reason. It makes no logical sense to have free for all passage with no controls.

Richard Kennard Oct 14, 2024, 04:24 PM

Its rather odd then that the Senate Republicans blocked the border security bill as its fairly evident that they campaigned on border chaos.

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 04:33 PM

If you cross a border illegally, does that make you a criminal?

Phillip Van Niekerk Oct 14, 2024, 04:53 PM

A loophole in the amnesty process allowed people to come to the US and then wait 6 years for a hearing because of a shortage of judges. The bipartisan border bill tried to fix that, but Trump scuttled it because he wanted to run on border chaos. Biden has anyway managed to halve the numbers.

Johnny Bravo Oct 14, 2024, 06:07 PM

It seems we don't have any clear data on this, and it's mainly here-say. What do the people on the wall and the citizens in the cities close by have to say? Regardless, I don't want to give criminals amnesty because of a legal loophole. They ignored the laws of the country the went to?

Malcolm McManus Oct 15, 2024, 07:16 AM

Yes, He managed to halve the numbers after he tripled them. Leaves them far worse off.

Malcolm McManus Oct 15, 2024, 07:23 AM

The term illegal, tends to lean that way. Driving under the influence of alcohol is illegal. It tends to lead to a criminal record if you get caught.

Pierre Durand Oct 14, 2024, 06:04 PM

Just another bleeding heart liberal wanting to maintain the status quo.

eduardo.fernandez Oct 14, 2024, 06:36 PM

As a Latin American, I am appalled by the Trump's campaign against immigrants, who are mostly from L.A. but nobody talks that the U.S. have one of the more relaxed policies on immigration. I had two cousins who emigrated in the late 60's. That number multiplied.