Dailymaverick logo

Maverick News

Maverick News

Ramaphosa in resolve-and-reset mode on SA-US ties despite Trump's white Afrikaner genocide claims

SA President Cyril Ramaphosa was upbeat about his meeting with US President Donald Trump, despite it being derailed by Trump’s claims of genocide against white Afrikaners in South Africa.
Ramaphosa in resolve-and-reset mode on SA-US ties despite Trump's white Afrikaner genocide claims When South African President Cyril Ramaphosa emerged from the White House after a three-hour working visit with US President Donald Trump, his tone was calm, even warm. “It went very well,” Ramaphosa told reporters when asked how the meeting concluded. “Yes … It went very well,” he repeated, when asked if Trump had heard him. It was a diplomatic answer to what many viewed as an ambush in the Oval Office – broadcast live to the world – over one of the thorniest narratives in US-South Africa relations: Trump’s assertion that there is a “genocide of white farmers” occurring in South Africa. Despite Ramaphosa’s direct engagement on the issue – including bringing two of Trump’s favourite South African golf icons, Ernie Els and Retief Goosen – Trump would not budge. The president said bluntly that he is not backing down, as the world should hear what is happening. Asking for the lights to be dimmed, Trump displayed a video showing Julius Malema singing “Kill the Boer” and a memorial to slain white farmers. Ramaphosa, resolute yet respectful, disagreed. Rather than escalate, he stayed engaged, reflecting what he had earlier in the week described as his “rational” approach to diplomacy. He called on his agriculture minister, John Steenhuisen, and billionaire Johann Rupert to explain, but Trump did not appear convinced.  Read more: ‘In the end, we had a really good bilateral’ — Ramaphosa at press conference after Trump meeting [caption id="attachment_2729750" align="alignnone" width="1744"] SA's Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen speaks during a meeting between US President Donald Trump and South Africa President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office at the White House on 21 May 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images)[/caption]

Diplomatic reset, rough edges

Framed by South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) as a “reset” in the two countries’ relationship, the visit was a high-level attempt to move past previous misunderstandings and find common ground. And in some ways, it succeeded. For Ramaphosa, the objective was clear: preserve strategic partnerships, de-escalate political narratives, and advocate continued US support in areas of trade, security cooperation and global diplomacy. For Trump, the goals were more personal and political: reaffirm his administration’s position on global threats, reassert US leverage in trade relations and publicly underscore his own foreign policy instincts. That is why the meeting mattered beyond optics. It was a live display of geopolitical friction, nation-state interests as well as cooperation in real time. Read more: Ramaphosa’s Oval Office meeting with Trump is a diplomatic coup — now he must secure a deal [caption id="attachment_2729732" align="alignnone" width="1724"] Johann Rupert, Retief Goosen and Ernie Els attend a meeting between US President Donald Trump and South Africa's President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, 21 May 2025. (Photo: EPA-EFE / JIM LO SCALZO)[/caption]

America’s executive stage

The bilateral meeting in the Oval Office — the symbolic epicentre of American executive power — was live-streamed globally, giving millions the chance to observe foreign policy being made in real time. This format is rare. Historically, most bilateral discussions at this level happen behind closed doors, with filtered readouts to the press. But Trump, now in his second term, has made transparency a hallmark of his executive style – even when it invites confrontation. The result: Ramaphosa had to defend South Africa’s democracy and human rights record not just to a counterpart, but to a global audience. Ramaphosa’s decision to bring Ernie Els and Retief Goosen was a calculated move to soften the tone and meet Trump in a cultural comfort zone. It was also deeply symbolic. Golf, often dismissed as “soft diplomacy”, has long served as a relationship tool in US political circles, particularly in Republican administrations. Still, Trump’s genocide claim remained a sticking point. Ramaphosa’s effort to counter this narrative in person was respectful and data driven, according to sources familiar with the conversation. “He didn’t yell. He didn’t grandstand,” said a senior South African official. “He corrected, clarified and moved forward.” And forward they went — straight to lunch. Read more: Trump’s Afrikaner refugees — the search for white victims [caption id="attachment_2729689" align="alignnone" width="2560"] President of South Africa Cyril Ramaphosa (C-L) meets with US President Donald Trump (C-R) in the Oval Office of the White House on 21 May 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images)[/caption]

Three-course statecraft

The Bilateral Working Lunch, held in the Cabinet Room and closed to the press, offered a different environment. Over a three-course meal, both delegations had the opportunity to shift tone, explore areas of alignment and build rapport. At a press conference later at the Ritz-Carlton, President Ramaphosa smiled when asked about the lunch menu. “It was a three-course meal,” he said. He explained that he usually does not eat dessert, but it looked good. He had some; the lunch was “delicious”. This moment – small but telling – captured a recurring theme of the visit: the balance of serious policy and human diplomacy.

Common ground: The DRC

Not all was disagreement. Both sides hailed progress in brokering a ceasefire in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), with South Africa playing a stabilising role and the US offering diplomatic pressure. “This is a clear example of what responsible regional leadership looks like,” Trump acknowledged, praising South Africa’s role. Ramaphosa, in turn, thanked the US for “being firm but fair” and for “backing African-led solutions”. This area of cooperation showed that despite disagreements on domestic issues, the two countries can find alignment on continental security, counter-terrorism and regional peacebuilding. Read more: Experts reject SANDF’s inference that SAMIDRC was a success Ramaphosa pressed for renewal of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa), set to expire soon. Trump did not make a commitment, but South African officials left “optimistic”. The language of reciprocity versus partnership may be where future possibilities lie — and where the next South Africa-US conversation must dig deeper.

Two presidents, two rationalities

In international relations theory, states are often described as “rational actors”, meaning they make decisions based on their own national interest. But rationality is not always uniform — it depends on goals, history and world-view. Trump’s rationality is transactional, built on a “show strength and never retreat” doctrine. Ramaphosa’s rationality is procedural, focused on long-term stability, alliance-building and respectful dialogue. The meeting showed what happens when these two logics meet: tension, yes, but also opportunities for clarity. In the end, President Ramaphosa left the White House pleased that “re-engagement” is beginning, even if he didn’t persuade Trump on every point. His calm posture, cultural savvy and commitment to engagement showed a clear effort to elevate South Africa’s global profile without sacrificing its values. “Very well,” he said again as he departed the White House North Portico, in a delegation with his golfing envoys. “Yes, he [Trump] did hear me.” The US-South Africa relationship is not built on total agreement. But after today, it could be built more on mutual recognition of differences, of truths and of the need to keep talking.  By the time President Ramaphosa exited the White House through the North Portico at 2.58pm in Washington, the skies had cleared – a fitting image for a meeting marked by stormy differences, but also by efforts to reset and re-engage. DM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nh25AmXWxpU

When South African President Cyril Ramaphosa emerged from the White House after a three-hour working visit with US President Donald Trump, his tone was calm, even warm.

“It went very well,” Ramaphosa told reporters when asked how the meeting concluded. “Yes … It went very well,” he repeated, when asked if Trump had heard him.

It was a diplomatic answer to what many viewed as an ambush in the Oval Office – broadcast live to the world – over one of the thorniest narratives in US-South Africa relations: Trump’s assertion that there is a “genocide of white farmers” occurring in South Africa.

Despite Ramaphosa’s direct engagement on the issue – including bringing two of Trump’s favourite South African golf icons, Ernie Els and Retief Goosen – Trump would not budge.

The president said bluntly that he is not backing down, as the world should hear what is happening. Asking for the lights to be dimmed, Trump displayed a video showing Julius Malema singing “Kill the Boer” and a memorial to slain white farmers.

Ramaphosa, resolute yet respectful, disagreed. Rather than escalate, he stayed engaged, reflecting what he had earlier in the week described as his “rational” approach to diplomacy.

He called on his agriculture minister, John Steenhuisen, and billionaire Johann Rupert to explain, but Trump did not appear convinced. 

Read more: ‘In the end, we had a really good bilateral’ — Ramaphosa at press conference after Trump meeting

SA's Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen speaks during a meeting between US President Donald Trump and South Africa President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office at the White House on 21 May 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images)


Diplomatic reset, rough edges


Framed by South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) as a “reset” in the two countries’ relationship, the visit was a high-level attempt to move past previous misunderstandings and find common ground. And in some ways, it succeeded.

For Ramaphosa, the objective was clear: preserve strategic partnerships, de-escalate political narratives, and advocate continued US support in areas of trade, security cooperation and global diplomacy.

For Trump, the goals were more personal and political: reaffirm his administration’s position on global threats, reassert US leverage in trade relations and publicly underscore his own foreign policy instincts.

That is why the meeting mattered beyond optics. It was a live display of geopolitical friction, nation-state interests as well as cooperation in real time.

Read more: Ramaphosa’s Oval Office meeting with Trump is a diplomatic coup — now he must secure a deal

Johann Rupert, Retief Goosen and Ernie Els attend a meeting between US President Donald Trump and South Africa's President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, 21 May 2025. (Photo: EPA-EFE / JIM LO SCALZO)


America’s executive stage


The bilateral meeting in the Oval Office — the symbolic epicentre of American executive power — was live-streamed globally, giving millions the chance to observe foreign policy being made in real time.

This format is rare.

Historically, most bilateral discussions at this level happen behind closed doors, with filtered readouts to the press. But Trump, now in his second term, has made transparency a hallmark of his executive style – even when it invites confrontation. The result: Ramaphosa had to defend South Africa’s democracy and human rights record not just to a counterpart, but to a global audience.

Ramaphosa’s decision to bring Ernie Els and Retief Goosen was a calculated move to soften the tone and meet Trump in a cultural comfort zone. It was also deeply symbolic.

Golf, often dismissed as “soft diplomacy”, has long served as a relationship tool in US political circles, particularly in Republican administrations.

Still, Trump’s genocide claim remained a sticking point. Ramaphosa’s effort to counter this narrative in person was respectful and data driven, according to sources familiar with the conversation.

“He didn’t yell. He didn’t grandstand,” said a senior South African official. “He corrected, clarified and moved forward.”

And forward they went — straight to lunch.

Read more: Trump’s Afrikaner refugees — the search for white victims

President of South Africa Cyril Ramaphosa (C-L) meets with US President Donald Trump (C-R) in the Oval Office of the White House on 21 May 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images)


Three-course statecraft


The Bilateral Working Lunch, held in the Cabinet Room and closed to the press, offered a different environment. Over a three-course meal, both delegations had the opportunity to shift tone, explore areas of alignment and build rapport.

At a press conference later at the Ritz-Carlton, President Ramaphosa smiled when asked about the lunch menu.

“It was a three-course meal,” he said.

He explained that he usually does not eat dessert, but it looked good. He had some; the lunch was “delicious”.

This moment – small but telling – captured a recurring theme of the visit: the balance of serious policy and human diplomacy.

Common ground: The DRC


Not all was disagreement. Both sides hailed progress in brokering a ceasefire in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), with South Africa playing a stabilising role and the US offering diplomatic pressure.

“This is a clear example of what responsible regional leadership looks like,” Trump acknowledged, praising South Africa’s role.

Ramaphosa, in turn, thanked the US for “being firm but fair” and for “backing African-led solutions”.

This area of cooperation showed that despite disagreements on domestic issues, the two countries can find alignment on continental security, counter-terrorism and regional peacebuilding.

Read more: Experts reject SANDF’s inference that SAMIDRC was a success

Ramaphosa pressed for renewal of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa), set to expire soon. Trump did not make a commitment, but South African officials left “optimistic”.

The language of reciprocity versus partnership may be where future possibilities lie — and where the next South Africa-US conversation must dig deeper.

Two presidents, two rationalities


In international relations theory, states are often described as “rational actors”, meaning they make decisions based on their own national interest. But rationality is not always uniform — it depends on goals, history and world-view.

Trump’s rationality is transactional, built on a “show strength and never retreat” doctrine. Ramaphosa’s rationality is procedural, focused on long-term stability, alliance-building and respectful dialogue.

The meeting showed what happens when these two logics meet: tension, yes, but also opportunities for clarity.

In the end, President Ramaphosa left the White House pleased that “re-engagement” is beginning, even if he didn’t persuade Trump on every point. His calm posture, cultural savvy and commitment to engagement showed a clear effort to elevate South Africa’s global profile without sacrificing its values.

“Very well,” he said again as he departed the White House North Portico, in a delegation with his golfing envoys. “Yes, he [Trump] did hear me.”

The US-South Africa relationship is not built on total agreement. But after today, it could be built more on mutual recognition of differences, of truths and of the need to keep talking. 

By the time President Ramaphosa exited the White House through the North Portico at 2.58pm in Washington, the skies had cleared – a fitting image for a meeting marked by stormy differences, but also by efforts to reset and re-engage. DM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nh25AmXWxpU

Comments

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso May 22, 2025, 07:32 AM

We are a rainbow nation getting to grips with our own complexities, sufferings and neuroses. While there is no objective question that the death rate is crazy and that some of our laws prejudice minorities, we need to not succumb to the ignorant divisive stupidity with which the USA is killing itself. We have come so far, and for the first time our trajectory is on the up. Focus people, focus.

André Pelser May 22, 2025, 08:09 AM

Several laws discriminate against minorities on the basis of race. The current EWC law will give dysfunctional local governments controlled by ANC cadres the power to EWC - despite legal process challenging the EWC - surely not a "trajectory on the up"? The term "genocide" is being abused, but that crime in SA is out of control is a fact, also neglect of rural safety measures by the govt. RET will not deliver the economic growth necessary for a better future.

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso May 22, 2025, 08:41 AM

Anyone with a brain knows there is still a mountain to climb but we are seeing power improve, border controls improve, GNU introducing better self checking governance, public private partnerships introduced. Vulindlela is beginning to show green shoots. These things are the most hopeful signs in the last 20 years, so yes I stand by "up". Whether we like it or not working and compromising as a nation is the only possible way to a better South Africa for all of us.

col May 22, 2025, 08:55 AM

100% .. even today, millions will be stolen from the fiscus by Ramaphosa's cadre's - until this stops, there will no peace, no security, no power, no water .. and no economic growth. Am disappointed that corruption - and the fact that there are no orange overall clad cadre's - was not brought up in the televised meeting, and too much attention was given to the 'genocide of white farmers'. Opportunity missed, hope it was discussed behind closed doors.

Shelagh L May 22, 2025, 09:18 AM

What makes you think that the USA can discuss or comment on any corruption in South Africa when Trump is not only a convicted criminal, but has just accepted a $400 million plane from Qatar? Pot calling the kettle black. Although nothing would surprise me from Trump.

Paddy Ross May 22, 2025, 10:38 AM

Trump's diplomacy style reminds one of the Chicago Saint Valentine's Day Massacre of one hundred years ago. Pity he doesn't use it when talking to Putin about peace in Ukraine.

Jubilee 1516 May 22, 2025, 10:41 AM

He received no plane whatsoever. None. USAF did. He did accept another 500 billion plus US$ investment from Qatar on behalf of his country, and his country's position on the UN HDI's and Corruption Index allow him to say anything he wants about SA corruption, especially since the billions his country donates to SA also get stolen. If Malema, Ramaphosa Bela-Bela etc were in the USA, they too would be convicted criminals.

Richard Bryant May 22, 2025, 08:13 AM

Well put!

Andrew Mortimer May 22, 2025, 09:59 AM

Spot on!

Mark Hammick May 22, 2025, 07:54 AM

The success [or not] of the visit needs to be measured in, inter alia, economic growth in South Africa and the reduction of the horrific unemployment.

Lawrence Sisitka May 22, 2025, 07:59 AM

As usual, Trump does not do 'discussion', he does: lie, harangue, threaten and insult. Even his apparent agreement means nothing, as it could change by the time he wakes up (although, of course, he never will). So Ramaphosa stood up well to this nonsense. Why the world takes a single thing Trump says seriously is a mystery, presumably it is solely because of the US economic and military power, although the former may be in terminal decline, with luck to be followed by the latter.

megapode May 22, 2025, 02:19 PM

Nobody has to take any thing Trump says as reliable, and many do not. But we have to take it seriously because the USA is the biggest fish in the pond, a huge market that everybody wants to do business with. Because, as Trump said (and this we can rely on) without the USA the G20 doesn't mean a lot. Same with NATO. Like it or not the USA, and thus the President of the USA, have enormous influence. We don't have to kowtow to Trump, but we also cannot just wish him away.

D'Esprit Dan May 22, 2025, 07:22 PM

Spot on. The balance we need in dealing with Trump has to acknowledge that our economy is shot and we have 40%+ real unemployment. Tilting at that windmill is callous and dismissive of our poverty levels.

Jubilee 1516 May 22, 2025, 08:19 AM

The ten stages of genocide according to Genocide Watch. We are at nine, and Trump reminded us : I. Classification ​ ii. Symbolization ​ iii. Discrimination ​ iv. Dehumanization ​ v. Organization ​ vi. Polarization ​ vii. Preparation ​ viii. Persecution ​ ​ix. Extermination ​ x. Denial

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso May 22, 2025, 08:57 AM

Wow! I can rank us? This is so very helpful for all South Africans. Thanks so much for sharing!

Jubilee 1516 May 22, 2025, 09:27 AM

My pleasure my brother.

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso May 22, 2025, 09:41 PM

Ha - I do so love an appreciative troll.

Dillon Birns May 22, 2025, 10:08 AM

[Goes to the Genocide Watch website... clicks on 'South Africa'... scrolls down to 'Country Overview' where it clearly states 'Stage 6: Polarisation']... If you're going to use Genocide Watch as a credible source, then quote it for what it says.

Jubilee 1516 May 22, 2025, 10:45 AM

WOW, thank you, so I can use our official number 6 position on the same scale many use to gauge the Palestinian poistion, as a strong argument. I simply leave that decision open to those living here and being at the receiving end of the most racist legal system on the planet for more than a century and the genocidal songs, farm murder stats per 100 000 to comfortably place us between 8 and 9. Thank you again. It is happening.

Hidden Name May 22, 2025, 11:39 AM

Straw man - please try to address the points made? Your obsession with Palestine isnt relevant to this discussion.

D'Esprit Dan May 22, 2025, 07:27 PM

So you use their classification and then dismiss it as inaccurate? Doesn't fit your narrative? That's a wee bit sad, brother.

megapode May 22, 2025, 10:58 AM

Earlier this week on X it was stage 8, so things have moved quickly. But where is all this extermination happening? I walk around my neighborhood in the mornings (suburb, not a gated estate) & somehow I make it back in time for breakfast. Sometimes I even walk down to the local park. I see other folks there, also not getting exterminated. Tell me that we have too much violent crime & I will agree. Tell me that white folks are being exterminated and, well, that's not what I see around me

D'Esprit Dan May 22, 2025, 07:30 PM

Yeah, but to some, reality doesn't matter. I agree with you. I walk my dogs in the mornings without getting my throat slit or set upon by bloodthirsty natives. My dogs are pugs, so not exactly killer defenders!

megapode May 22, 2025, 01:02 PM

We should always be concerned about extermination (in this case). We know that it can happen. But we should worry about extermination that is really happening. And I don't see that. Tell me that our rate of violent crime is too high and I'll agree with you, but extermination?

Leon Groenveld May 22, 2025, 08:22 AM

Deeply shameful for our nation that it has taken a moral dwarf to force our attention and, dare one hope, finally increased action on this matter. Trump does, however, grasp something that still eludes our courts: You can not persist in singing " Kill the Boer " and then be surprised if some imbecile takes it into his head to do just that.

Rob Wilson May 22, 2025, 09:03 AM

Absolutely. Or that defence against it turns violent. Violent threats result in violent action.

Hidden Name May 22, 2025, 11:43 AM

Or the state's active suppression of attempts of farmers to protect themselves. They (farmers) had plans for response force and better communication to react to attacks. I think we forget - this was a major issue for several years with some real horror stories. That the stories stopped recently may mean SAPS achieved something (highly unlikely) or something else is suppressing these attacks. Underlying reasons they happened are still there, after all.

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso May 22, 2025, 09:04 AM

The power of the song is that people fixate on it. Its a distraction. Focus attention on our economy. If we get that right our lived experience will change completely and evil divisive people like Malema will fade into insignificance.

Rod MacLeod May 22, 2025, 09:16 AM

How can you find this comment unsuitable? "But will the ANC, which through the SAHRC endorses Malema's refrain, still back it as a harmless, non-threatening, non-racist, liberation song?"

Dillon Birns May 22, 2025, 10:27 AM

I understand the song’s symbolism and that it's not meant to be taken literally — but banning it could arguably do more for nation-building, as a gesture to both the US and right-leaning South Africans. That said, factions within the ANC (along with the MKP and EFF) would almost certainly oppose it. It would require the President of South Africa to spend political capital in the national interest, not as a representative of the Party.

Jubilee 1516 May 22, 2025, 10:47 AM

No symbolism about it at all. Intentional to boot. Renaldo Gouws was correctly called out for merely a comparison to the "non literal" song as approved by our apex court and our president.

ANTHONY MCGUINNESS May 22, 2025, 10:51 AM

Try telling that to the families who have lost loved ones by people that did exactly that, fixate on the songs. The fact remains that the courts encourage the crime by not acting decisively against race based violence. Try also telling the 42% of unemployed people in this country, that go hungry every day, to focus on the economy.

D'Esprit Dan May 22, 2025, 07:38 PM

Do you have concrete evidence - real evidence - of a correlation between the song and farm murders? I'm not (and never will) defend the singing of it, but please can you refer me to absolute slam dunk evidence of the correlation.

Leon Groenveld May 23, 2025, 07:52 AM

Fair point. Just intrigued how you'd go about getting that evidence? Exit polls after the song has been sung as to immediate and long term intentions? Interviews with convicted perps as to their preferred stimulant? BTW Now THERE would be an interesting statistic: Rate of successful prosecution and conviction of farm murderers - whether they be musically inclined or not.

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso May 22, 2025, 09:49 PM

Yoh - I'm not sure where the disconnect is but the precise reason people are starving is because of our bad economy. ...ipso facto it makes complete sense that our national focus should be on improving it.

D'Esprit Dan May 22, 2025, 07:36 PM

Can you objectively provide statistics that show a positive correlation between that song and the murder of white farmers? I'd really like to see hard, reliable evidence of it. Much like playing LPs backwards (I'm showing my age) didn't turn me into a diabolical Satanist, does the song actually result in spikes in white farmer murders? Show the correlation.

Leon Groenveld May 23, 2025, 08:58 AM

Dear Dan Proving correlation, as you surely know, would be well nigh impossible. Singing hymns every Sunday as a kid failed to make me religious - 'nuff said. However, changing the " Boer /Farmer " to any other racial description and lustily singing it at bring & braais, rugby matches etc would probably put somewhat of a damper on our much touted spirit of Nation Building. To echo another comment here: Has logic left the building?

megapode May 23, 2025, 11:52 AM

People do stuff when they hear songs. It's not always the fault of the song, the songwriter, the singer. Charles Manson said he received instruction from the Beatles song "Helter Skelter". And there have been reports of kids listening to heavy metal music and then getting destructive ideas. It's not clear that the song plants the idea. Clearly not everybody who has heard Malema's chanting has been turned into a homicidal maniac.

André Pelser May 22, 2025, 08:23 AM

A pity that there was no mention of the widespread, endemic corruption and racist laws masquerading as BEE and 'transformation',no mention of the Concourt's ruling that "Kill/shoot the boer" is not hate speech, the lack of any prosecution of ANC cadre corruption unearthed by the Zondo commission and the disintegration of public facilities and our physical infrastructure. Who will invest when required to hand over 30% of their investment to an ANC cadre?

megapode May 23, 2025, 11:56 AM

That's telling. OK... Trump will only invoke what is important to him and his agenda. So he's concerned about white folks who testify that they are being persecuted, but he's less concerned about embezzlement as long as it's not inside his country.

Rae Earl May 22, 2025, 08:33 AM

Ramaphosa handled it very well. That's his fortè, negotiation and diplomacy. As a political leader he's a failure. What SA needs is to have Ramaphosa replace Ronald Lamola as Minister of International Relations and the DA to head the GNU and take over the financial and overall administration of South Africa. Right now Julius Malema must stink in the eyes of his countrymen as his actions have become a major point in the US's anti-SA stance. Ramaphosa may have rescued things somewhat.

D'Esprit Dan May 22, 2025, 07:39 PM

Well said, Rae!

Dragon Slayer May 22, 2025, 08:43 AM

Ramaphosa had a good night calm and collected - but with Trump's the truth is what he says it is. No win possible! Steenhuisen, childishly missed an opportunity to show unity and common purpose by saying the DA only joined to keep Malema and Zuma out. Blew it! Goosen may have played into Trumps narrative with his family story of being in siege at the farm. Oooops! Main message - we have lost control of the country to criminals, no idea how to solve it, need your help - but invest anyway!

D'Esprit Dan May 22, 2025, 07:44 PM

Yeah, it was a bit desperate at points, but what do you do when confronted by the likes of Trump? Sneer back at school mass murders? Mass murders that number more than one a day? Or do you hold the line and hope that the life boat gets to you in the tempest? Don't have much time for Cyril, but he did the best under the circumstances. Albeit circumstances his abject party and administration has left us in. We don't have cards to play because the ANC stole them all.

Greg Marcia May 22, 2025, 08:52 AM

The way the meeting went was predicted by Rob Hersov; not everyone’s cup of tea but a solid thinker. South Africa has long since lost the gloss of the Mandela days. Rupert is a star and the reason the door was opened to Cyril. But the reality is that under the ANC crime is worse than under the old NAT government and there is not even an armed struggle call it what you like underway. the people of South Africa have a lot of tolerance but the ANC and its policies have destroyed and not built progress.

Leon Torres May 22, 2025, 03:01 PM

I don't know factually whether or not crime is worse now than it was under the old NAT government. What I do know, is that statistically, everyone is counted now, as is every crime. I grew up being woken up at night by gunshots in the streets, as gang members, ruffians and tsotsi's strongly debated their points of view in our neighbourhoods. I don't know if other people knew how we lived, or how many died during this time. I don't think it was ever recorded if was not clearly linked to political unrest. Fortunately, my children (born in this millenium) have never been woken up in the middle of the night by a gunshot. Living under the NAT government definitely meant different existences for different people.

Leon Groenveld May 22, 2025, 05:27 PM

One Leon to another: a Very true and relevant post, thank you. Lives lived. However, we now live in an inclusive and democratic society. Folks vote for people that supposedly care for their ( the folks' ) wellbeing. This has conclusively been shown to be an illusion. Voters have now had more than 30 years to change this. They have not, and I am not holding my breath. In the end, in a democracy, we all get the Government we deserve.

D'Esprit Dan May 22, 2025, 07:48 PM

It took voters (those who could, of course) 46 years to kick apartheid into touch. It's not new in SA.

Johan Buys May 22, 2025, 08:57 AM

A good outcome will be if SA reverts back to be truly non-aligned. We should realize that nobody (East or West) is actually our friend, everybody places their own interests first.

A Rosebank Ratepayer May 22, 2025, 09:04 AM

It was good for the ANC delegates to see how anti- white rhetoric looks in front of a global audience and how much damage it can do. The trade unionist ultimately requires successful businesses for members. She will have seen how unappetising the EFF and MK rants appear to a global audience and therefore how pointless saying no one must interfere with our view of what we believe must happen in SA. Luckily Zim wasn’t mentioned - it would have been the ultimate turn off.

Hester S May 22, 2025, 09:22 AM

I hope that especially white South Africans continue to counter this incredibly toxic and demonstrably false narrative. Crime and corruption are big challenges for our country, but tactics such as these are meant to sow division, and that will not help. There is too much work to be done if we are to ensure that all South Africans can live safe, dignified lives. Also, in case nobody is noticing, America has lately been nothing to aspire to as far as a lack of corruption goes...

D'Esprit Dan May 22, 2025, 07:54 PM

I hope so too. I also hope that the EFFs toxicity is booted into touch if we're to actually build a cohesive society. As a South African living in SA, watching that hateful rhetoric was shocking. We really need to reclaim thr narrative from both the far right and left and map out an economic CODESA to rescue South Africa from the destructive fringes.

MG L May 22, 2025, 10:25 AM

Let's face it, it was a vetklap for the ANC's policies of discrimination and insensivity against a minority group, and their inability to keep law and order. The world now sees it for what it is, the myth of the noble, persecuted black has been killed by the ANC. Kudos to Trump for being the only world leader with the testosterone to call it out, other world leaders will undoubtedly follow if there is no change in South Africa.

Johndavid Metcalf May 22, 2025, 11:40 AM

Yep, and as also mentioned it's a pity the 142 Race laws weren't mentioned (reason why Elon isn't establishing Starlink in SA). Looking forward to G20 in November and I hope that SA's , among other things, Fiscal mismangement, Race Laws, bloated cabinet, over -payed Gov Employees and 400+ generals, mis-use of Foreign donations etc are then exposed. I'm looking forward to some positive changes as a result of this US interaction.

superjase May 22, 2025, 03:00 PM

i suggest you read through those 142 laws. you might be surprised by what you (don't) find. eg the race relations act: the constitution of any trade union or employers' organisation which intends to register may not include any provision that discriminates directly or indirectly against any person on the grounds of race or sex. this expressly forbids discrimination based on race. the vast majority of the rest aim to represent under-represented groups (incl gender and disability).

D'Esprit Dan May 22, 2025, 07:57 PM

It was a toxic assault fuelled by a fuel from Pretoria who has an axe to grind. That the bulk of Trump's 'evidence' has been debunked in a matter of hours illustrates just how desperate his allegations are. Absolute bunk. Drivel.

megapode May 22, 2025, 11:01 AM

I don't think there was any ambush. The President and his team knew that there was likely going to be some provocation from Trump and/or Vance. They couldn't know for sure what form it was going to take. So what could they do? Be prepared for something out of left field and be determined to play it with a straight bat. Which they did, and which the President continued to do in the post-meeting press conference.

D'Esprit Dan May 22, 2025, 07:58 PM

Spot on.

megapode May 22, 2025, 11:05 AM

I don't see this as a diplomatic ambush. The President and his team couldn't know EXACTLY what was going to happen, but they would be very silly indeed if they did not expect provocation from Trump &/or Vance. What could they do then? Be prepared for something out of left field, and be determined to play whatever it turned out to be with a straight bat. What else could they do? Stand up and walk out? Where would that have got anybody?

D'Esprit Dan May 22, 2025, 07:59 PM

Spot on. Again. Can you stop posting so I don't have to keep saying 'Spot on?'

megapode May 23, 2025, 12:29 PM

Sorry. I get emails from DM that my comments have been rejected. The edit link doesn't work. So I try to remake the same point, and then they both pop up.

Gary Crawford-Scott May 22, 2025, 11:34 AM

Zingiswa Losi, the Trade Unionist, said it all. Mass unemployment and poverty have resulted in a deluge of violent criminality for decades. However, no amount of outside investment will alleviate this problem. The government is responsible for addressing the underlying conditions that cause such widespread misery. Corruption, nepotism, wasted spending, over-regulation of business, BEE, and a thousand other issues have dragged this potentially affluent country to its knees. If you're too ashamed to clean your own house, you'll have to suffer the shame of having its filthy state exposed to the world. One can hate Trump for exposing the dirt, but South Africa is long overdue for a thorough spring cleaning.

D'Esprit Dan May 22, 2025, 08:01 PM

Please point me to where Trump addressed corruption and cadre deployment as the root of our ills? They are, but he didn't.

Chris.Botha May 22, 2025, 12:33 PM

I can't wait for DM to publish the REAL stats of Farm Murders, and admit that there is a genocidal problem amongst white farmers. Yes, it affects EVERY farmer, black or white, but the majority are white farmers being slaughtered. News publications such as DM, with their left-leaning bias, have not released a single article where they admit to this problem. It's because when you're white, you are by default a racist, and it is impossible to become a victim of anything.

D'Esprit Dan May 22, 2025, 08:03 PM

Tell you what, Chris, since you've obviously got the 'real' stats, give us a link, that has actual evidence. Real, you know, data, not massaged BS masquerading as evidence. Ta!

megapode May 22, 2025, 02:16 PM

I am wondering why JD Vance wasn't all over Ernie Els for not having his top shirt button done up.

Marc Caldwell May 22, 2025, 04:24 PM

When do we start joining the dots? The operative word is GENOCIDE in SA's accusation of Israel in the ICJ. Israel in a USA ally. So Trump levels the same genocide accusation against the ANC government; to make it look hypocritical. The rest is a sideshow.