Dailymaverick logo

Maverick News

Maverick News

Digital nomads row — Cape Town mayor suggests tax on short-term rentals to protect locals

Cape Town’s problems with digital nomads are well documented – from claims of driving up rental costs to causing a shortage of accommodation, particularly in the centre of town. What is to be done? Cape Town mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis says one option is to put everyone on an equal footing by implementing suitable taxes on short-term rentals.
Digital nomads row — Cape Town mayor suggests tax on short-term rentals to protect locals

Hill-Lewis says a process is under way to change tariffs for those operating short-term rentals, adding that there needs to be an “equal playing field” in the accommodation sector. 

As Daily Maverick has reported, digital nomads occupy short term-rentals along the Atlantic Seaboard, much to the ire of residents, who feel they are being priced out of accommodation in the city as owners rent out apartments and homes to digital nomads who spend weeks working remotely. 

Read more: Cape Town’s rental crisis: are digital nomads driving prices beyond reach for locals?

Advocacy project Inside Airbnb reported there were about 25,816 listed rentals on the short-term rental platform by 28 December 2024, largely concentrated along the Atlantic Seaboard, in the southern suburbs and along the city’s coast. 

While these nomads often appear on social media taking in the city’s tourist attractions and entertainment venues, there is a downside: activists claim the housing crisis in the city is worsened by these visitors. Writing in Daily Maverick, Ndifuna Ukwazi’s Zacharia Mashele and Buhle Booi say this drives up rental prices, making it difficult for locals, particularly low- and middle-income households, to secure affordable housing.

In a wide-ranging interview with Daily Maverick this week, Hill-Lewis said he agreed with sentiments that short-term rentals need to be taxed “appropriately”. 

“You can’t come into a very tourism-rich market and basically run a small hotel… if you’re running a permanent Airbnb, that’s what it is, but you’re not taxed like a hotel, you’re taxed like a private house,” he said. 

The mayor said a process was under way to convert “permanent Airbnbs where people are not just renting out a room or renting out their granny flat” from residential to commercial tariffs. 

“I think that’s only fair,” he said, adding: “There has to be an equal playing field.” 

He explained that he could not tell developers of major hotel chains that they needed to pay business tariffs in the city because they run hotels while others who run operations like these on a much smaller scale do not. 

Processes in the City’s revenue department were under way to change these tariffs for those for whom this is a main business. 

“So, for me, that’s about an equal playing field, no questions asked there.” 

Read more: After the Bell: Saying no to digital nomads

Hill-Lewis is not the only government official to add to the discussion about short-term rentals and their impact. 

The issue was raised in Parliament in October 2024. Senzo Nkala, the tourism department’s director of policy planning and strategy, told MPs on the tourism oversight committee that the department was looking into regulatory frameworks, including an approach to short-term rentals. 

He said that when the department did consultations on the Tourism White Paper, for the development and promotion of tourism, there was an intention to support long-term rental markets and prevent large property owners from monopolising housing supply for short-term rental purposes, which can lead to rising rental costs and the displacement of long-term tenants.

According to the Parliamentary Monitoring Group, Nkala said that during consultations, estate agents had raised concerns about unregulated short-term rentals. They had complained that property owners bought a number of properties for short-term rental use without involving agents, leading to neighbourhood disruptions such as noise and nuisance complaints.

The department, Nkala said, intended to start extensive consultations with key stakeholders, focusing on how threshold-based rules could be implemented to balance market access with regulation and public interest.

In its impact report on Cape Town, short-term rental platform Airbnb said it had “long led calls for short-term rentals to be regulated”, and that regulation would help provide policy certainty for hosts and guests, and create a level playing field for all operators. 

In September 2023, the department and Airbnb also signed a memorandum of understanding, which includes a national registration system and a national database for short-term rentals in the country to “provide transparency into the short-term rental market”. 

“While taxing short-term rental owners like commercial properties may be a step towards regulating the market, it does not address the root issue: the unchecked prioritisation of short-term profits over the right to housing,” said Jonty Cogger, an attorney at Ndifuna Ukwazi. 

He told Daily Maverick that without stronger protections for tenants, better rent controls and a commitment to well-located, affordable housing, “Cape Town will continue to cater to tourists and digital nomads at the expense of its own residents… the City must act urgently to ensure that housing serves people, not just profits.” DM

Comments

Michael Cinna Feb 13, 2025, 01:55 PM

Ah yes, rent controls. If only we had vast historical evidence of what happens when you introduce rent controls and the outcomes it produces. Look at the inner cities in the US, and particularly, NY (Harlem). Ironically, rent controls hurt the very people you're aiming to protect.

Rod MacLeod Feb 13, 2025, 02:38 PM

Indeed.

Johnny Bravo Feb 13, 2025, 02:53 PM

Not necessarily, because they mitigate and improve in the very short term, and completely break in the long run. These ideas MUST have a sell by date, which is agreed to. Not unlike BEE.

Michael Cinna Feb 13, 2025, 04:45 PM

As as we all know, government is always willing to give up power or policy.

mb27 Feb 13, 2025, 09:32 PM

Not sure how you read "rent control" into expecting businesses to pay business taxes. This is not aimed at those renting out a spare room, or granny flat. That's a straw man argument. It's aimed at people who buy property with the sole aim of B&B rental income. i.e. run a business.

Michael Cinna Feb 14, 2025, 06:41 AM

I read it by reading the article - "He told Daily Maverick that without stronger protections for tenants, better rent controls and a commitment to well-located, affordable housing"

Michael Cinna Feb 14, 2025, 06:50 AM

Are landlords not business owners? When you rent out property for long-term are you not running a business or earning rent income? Please tell me where in the article that it exempts "people renting out a spare room or granny flat"? Read the article again

Ritey roo roo Feb 14, 2025, 11:47 AM

"The mayor said a process was under way to convert “permanent Airbnbs where people are not just renting out a room or renting out their granny flat” from residential to commercial tariffs. “I think that’s only fair,” he said, adding: “There has to be an equal playing field.”

Michael Cinna Feb 14, 2025, 02:30 PM

What % of the total dwelling size (which is fully occupied) is deemed a "granny flat" and at what sqm and what are the permissible expenses? There is nothing in the tax code currently that says anything about "granny flat" and "single room". It's apportioned by sqm and % of dwelling occupied.

Michael Cinna Feb 14, 2025, 02:34 PM

Government market interventions to pursue a pseudo-moral goal of "equalizing the playing field" almost always ends up with further market distortion and further inequality as the government is picking winners and losers rather than letting the market decide.

Carsten Rasch Feb 13, 2025, 10:29 PM

Give us some examples. In my experience, rent control was a good thing. It meant as a youngster (in the eighties) you could find an apartment at a reasonable rental. Today, that’s impossible. It also means that entire areas become homogenous, unvaried, introverted and fearful of the other.

Michael Cinna Feb 14, 2025, 06:42 AM

Inner cities in the US is an excellent and well documented example (particularly Harlem).

alexkoutny.com Feb 14, 2025, 03:28 AM

Airbnb is banned in New York City for good reason and to great effect on affordability and quality of life. I live here and have seen the positive change. More visitors than ever, just not putting peeps on the street.

Michael Cinna Feb 14, 2025, 02:36 PM

Rent control in NYC is restricted to buildings built before 1947 or where a tenant has lived in the property in continuous occupancy since 1971. Go look at those buildings and listen to Thomas Sowell (black economist who grew up in Harlem).

Michael Cinna Feb 14, 2025, 02:40 PM

The biggest supporters of affordable housing will be the first residents to block development of affordable housing in their neighbourhood or next door to them.

barrystrick3030 Feb 13, 2025, 02:11 PM

The term "looking a gift tourist" in the mouth springs to mind. Yes property owners make a profit from Digital Nomads and short term, but think of the employment and economic growth created by their spend. Taxing AirBnBs is not going to solve the National Governments massive housing crisis.

ralppeters Feb 13, 2025, 02:25 PM

Higher taxes and rent control in the CT tourist area will just lead to middle/high income earners paying less rent, the landlord spending less local money to maintain his property and investors pouring millions into these buildings moving somewhere else with bigger returns.

Michael Cinna Feb 13, 2025, 02:39 PM

100% - ample evidence worldwide that rent controls simply do not work. But when has practicality ever appealed to an activist. Moral posturing > Actual Outcomes.

Carsten Rasch Feb 13, 2025, 10:31 PM

Activism is bad?

Michael Cinna Feb 14, 2025, 06:44 AM

When it trumps practicality and your solution has historical evidence of negative outcomes (for the people you're trying to help) - then yes, in this particular example, activism is bad.

J5.crowth Feb 13, 2025, 08:33 PM

Higher taxes will lead to middle-high income earners paying more taxes. Higher rent will make them pay more rent. If you pay more taxes a landlord will naturaly have less disposable income but this ok since it goes to Fiscus which will redistribute it to paying interest on debt&social grants etc.

Rod MacLeod Feb 13, 2025, 02:37 PM

"Cape Town’s problems with digital nomads are well documented" - when digital nomads find your city hugely attractive and crowd out your rental space into high yield maximum occupancy, you call these "problems"? Somewhere this DM has gone nuts. Low yield, high density = SLUMS.

Glyn Morgan Feb 13, 2025, 06:11 PM

The answer is to build more accommodation for these DMs (digital nomads). How about starting a DM centre in Langa?

dirkschelli Feb 13, 2025, 02:44 PM

And What are Mr Lewis going to give back, improve your service delivery? Doubt it. And using the rest of the countries bad service delivery as the yard stick is pathetic. Just another tax to feed your overpaid public servants

feathers_mail Feb 14, 2025, 05:52 AM

It's hardly fair to complain about service delivery from CoCT. They operate under immense constraints and do an amazing job most of the time.

sophiahajibey Feb 13, 2025, 02:55 PM

Ditto to previous comments. Higher-income is taxed+ properties are maintained. Other inner cities are disaster Zones---Capetown has done what other Cities haven't ---thus creating thriving employment and facilities for anyone to enjoy--not squalor and degradation you fear to be in. we all know why?

Amos J Feb 13, 2025, 03:31 PM

So much for the DA paying lip service to reduction in red tape. They want more red tape and more taxes just like the ANC !

BillyBumhe Feb 13, 2025, 03:31 PM

Do we have any stats about these digital nomads or is this just hysterical, populist garbage from the usual crew of NGOs aiming to turn the City Bowl into a slum?

J5.crowth Feb 13, 2025, 08:38 PM

For Stats you should look at America's "H-1B" visa regime. Its basically exactly like the RSA's "Digital Nomad Visa" regime except in USA they have to pay tax, (in RSA we must just be grateful that they are spending their money here on food and rent so of course they should be exempt)

James Harris Feb 13, 2025, 04:46 PM

As a resident of the City Bowl I know the palpable anger that exists among renters who increasingly cannot find anywhere to live near their places of work. Landlords should learn to live with slightly less exorbitant returns on their rental properties - while creating more homes for CT residents.

Jennifer D Feb 14, 2025, 07:56 AM

Landlords are trying to make a living in a country that has regulations about hiring qualified white people. They already pay taxes. As a guesthouse owner I can say my margins are low - I don’t make a killing.

Michael Cinna Feb 14, 2025, 02:45 PM

You're telling entrepreneurs and property owners to adjust their circumstances - imagine if they told you to go live somewhere more affordable?

Michael Cinna Feb 13, 2025, 04:50 PM

Woeful reporting. DM just stats that there are 25k listed short-term AirBnB rentals, and then just casually links this to digital nomads? Given the minimum required salary for a nomad visa, there is no housing competition. It's like complaining that Blair Atholl doesn't have affordable housing.

Interested Observer Feb 13, 2025, 04:54 PM

Geordin dont make the mistake of pandering to populist demands that will eventually impair the City fiscus. Build more homes (and the infra to support). Problem solved. Tax and (eventually) be damned. Think longterm and strategically. Dont be a Rachel Reeves. Cape Town doesn't deserve this.

abrietraut Feb 13, 2025, 04:56 PM

Not a good idea to chase away people that spend their money which generates jobs and wealth. The city will just die a slow death like many other towns around the country. Geordin you're a smart guy. Don't screw this up...

varunse Feb 13, 2025, 05:27 PM

Ah yes, the government solution to a problem - give them more money...

CvD 1 Feb 13, 2025, 05:46 PM

Short term rentals are way more practical than long term rentals! The laws are stacked against us landlords when trying to get rid of a tenant! I personally stopped with air bnb and cater now for overseas post graduates as they pay in foreign currencies and are more manageable!

ot Feb 16, 2025, 11:38 AM

Indeed

Riaan Venter Feb 13, 2025, 06:21 PM

We'll just increase our prices to cover the taxes, which I'm sure all short-term renters will do. In my limited understanding of economics, if everyone raises prices to cover taxes (which digital nomads can afford), won't that just drive overall prices even higher?

Tumelo Tumelo Feb 13, 2025, 07:08 PM

Some lateral thinking would hv been wonderful here: ex policy head of DA joins Airbnb as its head of policy in Africa ( primarily focused on cpt) tells you everything you need to knw. Oh and who was lobbying for the nomad visa whilst with the DA, the said ex head of policy. Rent seeking 101!

Confucious Says Feb 13, 2025, 08:00 PM

A cigarette box calc would suggest that the gains from taxing digital nomads is less than the gains form their spending in SA and CPT in particular, especially when taking into account the multiplier effect of their spending on everything else that they do.

J5.crowth Feb 13, 2025, 08:26 PM

AirBnB property already paying Income Tax (to SARS) in addition to Rates (to COCT). As for the Nomad - she should be paying income tax if the source of her income is RSA, doesn't matter if she's in country for 183 days or less etc; source of income = locale from where services are rendered ie CT.

Jane Crankshaw Feb 14, 2025, 07:42 AM

Very valid comment!

Johan Buys Feb 15, 2025, 02:05 PM

Nope, we are a residency based tax system. A German couple doing software programming freelance while living remote in CPT pay zero tax here. There are nomads that like bragging about not paying tax anywhere in the world. They rotate out to skip time-based rules of some jurisdictions

Ja Tre Feb 13, 2025, 08:48 PM

The city should also start looking at the size of apartments in new developments in the city; Pigeon holes which are clearly not suited for permanent living, but perfect for investors with the intention to rent it out short term...

glennwithtwo Feb 13, 2025, 10:27 PM

Short-term lets have driven out locals in a few areas of the city. But these areas have been out of reach long before airbnb. What I see is the trickle-down of previously working-class suburbs becoming desirable because others are now out of reach. This is a positive trend. It is called development

Richard Blake Feb 14, 2025, 02:33 AM

As if South Africans are not paying enough tax already, and getting nothing in return. Release some land for low income housing DA.

geo Feb 14, 2025, 07:15 AM

This is a poorly referenced article that is either lazy reporting or wilfully misleading. The geo-boundaries of the source data for the 25000 claim stretches from Mamre to Gordons Bay, not Cape Town City and includes any house listed for any time - massively inflating total market.

geo Feb 14, 2025, 08:30 AM

1) the use of the incorrect figures is inflammatory and misleading 2) the claims of the NGO are presented without interrogation 3) the aspects of taxation by the city are not interrogated (what taxes, how much, what laws etc.) 4) the conflation of digital nomads and housing stock is poor.

Peter Atller Feb 14, 2025, 07:44 AM

The issue is not digital nomads, it's not developing greater CT. Infrastructure in the suburbs and greater Cape Town are neglected. With the right political will, you kill two birds with one stone. Enhancing & developing areas outside the CBD outskirts - & politically, you secure your left flank.

Jennifer D Feb 14, 2025, 07:48 AM

More taxes and tighter controls over small businesses is the opposite of what we need. We are over taxed and have no government support in return. We need the income. Why do these people want to live in the city center? No transport. So fix the problem Mr Mayor.

nevohadas Feb 14, 2025, 08:30 AM

This article starts with an extraordinary assumption turned miraculously into "fact" based on quoting misleading data. It takes 3 clicks to filter for entire apartments that are frequently let (airbnb businesses). The actual number of units is 4899 (inside airbnb, same source as the article).

paulhonig Feb 17, 2025, 07:17 AM

Sloppy journalism - from a generally good publication. The market tends to allocate resources more efficiently than well-meaning regulation (and more red tape). Thats proven. Even if the platform was banned houses would be converted to hotels instead. (Growth in) tourism is not going to go away...

Dillon Birns Feb 14, 2025, 09:31 AM

Has Cape Town considered a vacancy tax? Many holiday homes sit empty for most of the year. To maximise their value, owners should either rent them out when not in use or be taxed for leaving them vacant.

Johan Buys Feb 15, 2025, 11:38 AM

My daughter battled to find an apartment. In her searches, she’d ask the departing tenant why they are leaving. Most say they cannot live in an apartment that allows AirBnB any longer. Security goes, rules go, endless parties. I will NEVER buy in a block that allows AirBnB.

ot Feb 16, 2025, 11:36 AM

This "problem" is not only due to demand for short term lets, but also the punitive obligations on landlords (PIE ACT) in dealing with delinquent tenants in long term rentals. According to the TPN Squat Index, only 65% of tenants in the "affordable" R7k to R10k rental arena are in good standing.