Dailymaverick logo

Blog

Blog

The struggle for truth – how IOL aims to capitalise on USAID funding cuts

As Donald Trump announces huge cuts to USAID funding of media, IOL has not missed a beat to use the opportunity to wrap their own agenda using the thin veil of journalistic legitimacy by sending questions that they will warp to push their master’s bidding. This time we are taking a different approach in response.
The struggle for truth – how IOL aims to capitalise on USAID funding cuts

The recent moves by the new Trump administration to cut huge parts of the federal government budget has meant the entire USAID project is at risk, with all programmes being paused. USAID is a global aid organisation that works on various programmes, and has a small portion of its budget allocated to supporting media. 

Of the total $50bn budget, only $280m was budgeted to fund journalism and the free flow of information. The majority of that to organisations in Ukraine and countries in dire situations. At less than 1% of budget, foreign aid support of journalism is tragically low, given its importance to society. However, disinformation peddlers, like Elon Musk, and others on a local level, have been quick to claim “mainstream media” have been the major benefactor of USAID funding. 

This is yet another targeted attack on journalism, and compromised newsrooms, like that of IOL, don’t miss a beat to use the opportunity to wrap their own agenda using the thin veil of journalistic legitimacy by sending questions that they will warp to push their master’s bidding. We know this to be true because we have evidence and facts. 

Read more about IOL’s falsehoods:

IOL publicly apologises to Daily Maverick for false reporting

Press Council expels Independent Media group for failing to obey rulings

Press Council expulsion is another blow to the credibility of Iqbal Survé’s Independent Media

Iqbal Survé’s media must apologise to Karyn Maughan and delete Nazi slur column, Press Council finds

Revealed: Independent Media’s internal report on Piet Rampedi’s decuplets story found it was a hoax and demanded an apology

Fact-checking the Independent group’s reporting on the PIC report

So we’re taking a different approach this time, to show you how their leading questions, based on propaganda peddlers, like Rob Hersov, who make baseless claims and unchecked comments leads to even greater pollution of the information space. 

These are the list of questions sent to us (and most likely News24 as they addressed us as Mr Basson rather than anyone in our team).



Our responses


  1. While Daily Maverick hasn’t received any direct USAID funding, we lament the low levels of aid support for journalism around the world. As journalism suffers the impact of digital disruption, and some of our colleagues operate in war-torn countries or oppressive regimes, often foreign aid is the only option for sustainability. At 0.2% of all foreign aid, we believe this is a tragically low allocation and we can see the impact on not only our degraded information system but also democratic institutions.

  2. Please see notices we published last year announcing cost-cutting and retrenchments.

  3. Newsrooms around the world are under extreme financial pressure. Traditional business models are not working for enough publishers to serve national, regional and local audiences. The future looks bleak unless a policy intervention occurs that supports journalism, with incentives, rebates and other measures.

  4. Strange and possibly leading question, news publishers have accepted advertising for centuries and support from readers through subscriptions, memberships and donations.

  5. We’re seeing politically compromised (IOL) and economically compromised newsrooms being decimated, and the future looks bleak unless we see a policy intervention. The information system has little integrity left. It is very difficult to get those who push lies, and half-truths to be accountable for their actions and why legitimate newsrooms are being targeted.


Why we are taking this approach

IOL is a known disinformation operator, with a history of attacking legitimate news outlets like Daily Maverick. When others make baseless claims against professional media, IOL activates their stenographers to weaponise the reach they still enjoy to try to discredit targets. When convenient, they choose to twist our responses to suit their master’s bidding. 

Too many people still think of them as the digital front for some of South Africa’s most storied newspapers, and have yet to comprehend how deep the rot has infiltrated their compromised “newsroom”. 

We’re taking a different approach because the information system is broken, and we need a new way while we figure out how to deal with these various threats.DM

Comments

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso Feb 7, 2025, 08:14 PM

It is up to us, the people to support truth. We depend on it for our very existence, and so I for one will continue to support Daily Maverick and their brave team for as long and as generously as I am able.

Malcolm McManus Feb 8, 2025, 06:43 AM

"propaganda peddlers, like Rob Hersov", More like anti woke, blatant non BS, straight talker. At least he loves the country and wants to see it work, like most of us, unlike the people who are currently running it. I personally like his opinions. Listen to him frequently. He makes a lot of sense.

B M Feb 9, 2025, 10:47 AM

Echo chambers sound great, and they make a lot of sense. Doesn't make it true outside the cave. Funding should be provided to dissenting views, to avoid these echo chambers, and wake people up to the cognitive slumber that is "I like what I hear, so it must be true".

Michael Cinna Feb 8, 2025, 07:09 AM

Why has DM shut down the comments section on certain Trump related articles?

Malcolm McManus Feb 8, 2025, 07:39 AM

Suppression of freedom of speech. I don't agree with many opinions on this forum, but welcome everybody's right to express these opinions. Makes for healthy debate. Shutting the comments on certain topics, including SONA is an act of weakness. Fear of people speaking their mind.

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso Feb 8, 2025, 08:41 AM

This approach would prevent the spurious blocking of comments, reduce duplication, encourage engagement, and ideally rank the psychos at the bottom getting them of everyone's radar and clearly illustrating the response they deserve.

in Feb 8, 2025, 01:45 PM

How ironic then, that the DM's motto is "defend the truth", when they actually fear the truth.

BillyBumhe Feb 8, 2025, 05:52 PM

Probably because it gets tedious to moderate the angry, foul-mouthed racist deluge from Trump's fans?

Malcolm McManus Feb 8, 2025, 10:03 PM

They don't have to moderate it. The commentators do. Seen a lot of angry comments from the lefties. I welcome them. Freedom of speech. I sense an agenda.

chrismeier71 Feb 9, 2025, 06:27 AM

Maybe it is because some commenters don't know how to moderate? Ad hominem arguments are specifically mentioned in the guidelines, yet it is quite common to see these still make it through on nearly any article about Trump - remember, argue against the position, not attack the writer!

B M Feb 9, 2025, 10:51 AM

Agree Chris. But censorship does not provide a solution. Better to have ad-hominem attacks that can be refuted publicly; Hopefully, just maybe, the attacker's mind can be changed. Small chance, but worth it.

D'Esprit Dan Feb 8, 2025, 07:12 AM

DM has every right to respond to the constant slurs from Iqbal On Line. Not seen your name here before, did you scurry over from IOL quickly?

Grumpy Old Man Feb 8, 2025, 07:44 AM

Musk owns X, Trump 'truth central' - he who owns the 'socials' controls the narrative, controls sentiment. It's a Nazi propaganda machine on steroids and the intention is what exactly - mobilization for a cause? History tells us this does not end well!

Malcolm McManus Feb 8, 2025, 08:09 AM

All that was been done before Trump bought Twitter. Now its just less one sided.

Malcolm McManus Feb 8, 2025, 09:57 AM

Musk

Grumpy Old Man Feb 8, 2025, 11:52 AM

Just cos the messaging corresponds with yours or my own worldview, does not make it all potentially less dangerous. I think we should all be more than a little concerned at any persons (or group of persons) stepsto control 'the news' or capture opinion. Its no different to the Bell Pottinger saga

Malcolm McManus Feb 8, 2025, 10:06 PM

Or most of US mainstream media who are getting sued for just that.

Just Another Day Feb 8, 2025, 07:49 AM

The Star, have permanent posters up on Joburg's main arterials roads and they have been up for many months stating 'Why do banks treat blacks differently’. This is not just false advertising, but a breach of the City's advertising laws. Iqbal is guilty of maliciousness as he was caught out.

Ian Gwilt Feb 8, 2025, 09:12 AM

I read the star for 30 years and stopped when I realised what it had become. I do glance at the front page when I go into a shop, always full of indignation, outrage and arse licking of the boss IOL is one of the few news sites I never visit.

Just Another Day Feb 8, 2025, 07:52 AM

No. If you look at AYO's share price it is just a sea of red. You can choose your level of red depending on the amount of time held. If you were the lucky one to have held the share for 5 years your value is down -71.63%. Eish.

Joe Niemand Feb 8, 2025, 03:21 PM

Not relevant. Did or did the DM not accept tainted US taxpayer money, to fight a political battle against a major US party?

in Feb 8, 2025, 01:47 PM

I care very deeply about this scandal. The DM regularly places rabid anti-Trump material. This seems to have been funded, albeit indirectly, by US taxpayers. This is a clear conflict of interest and corruption, abusing taxpayer money to publish party-political propaganda. You should be worried too.

stua Feb 8, 2025, 02:08 PM

I am not a Trump supporter , but now is the time for DM to release the names of its major funders.

in Feb 8, 2025, 02:31 PM

I agree completely. If the DM really is serious about its motto, defending the truth, it must without delay publish the names of its funding sources. No serious publication can accept taxpayer money and then abuse such money to publish propaganda favouring a particular political party.

in Feb 8, 2025, 02:10 PM

The only ethical response for a serious publication to this scandal, if the allegations are true, would be to immediately return all the money received from Soros's OSF. This would imply bankruptcy, but better to declare bankruptcy than to carry on with a tainted legacy and no credibility.

BillyBumhe Feb 8, 2025, 05:51 PM

Gosh, Trump supporters are fragile about criticism of their naked emperor.

Con Tester Feb 8, 2025, 01:59 PM

IOL's overt biases are obvious to any impartial observer. The opinion pieces that are published there are about as diverse as vanilla custard. Its "journalistic balance" is an object lesson in voodoo. And its hacks' English language skills have a vigorous entropy that is often quite unique.

Con Tester Feb 8, 2025, 02:13 PM

Go and check out IOL's response published earlier today under the title "IOL Strikes a Nerve: Daily Maverick's USAID Funding under spotlight" and curiously anonymous byline "IOL Reporter." You should care about which news source is publicly lying to, and about, whom.

in Feb 8, 2025, 03:02 PM

IOL has no credibility BUT the DM owes its readers an answer to the core question: Did it receive funding from the OSF and therefore from the US taxpayer? Did it abuse that money to publish articles favouring one US party? This is like the Info Scandal in SA, and IOL's credibility isn't relevant.

Joe Niemand Feb 8, 2025, 03:20 PM

IOL's credibility doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is whether this publication accepted tainted US taxpayer money and then used it for party-political purposes - the constant stream of daily anti-Trump invective. If it did, the DM is in very serious trouble.