Dailymaverick logo

Maverick Citizen

This article is more than a year old

Maverick Citizen

Labour Court orders former National Health Laboratory Service chief to pay R22m in damages 

Five years after Joyce Mogale, former CEO of the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS), was fired for contraventions of the Public Finance Management Act, the Labour Court has ordered her to pay more than R22m in damages to the NHLS.
Labour Court orders former National Health Laboratory Service chief to pay R22m in damages 

The Labour Court has dismissed a claim for unfair dismissal brought by former National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) CEO Joyce Mogale against the NHLS. It further ruled that she must pay the public entity more than R22-million in light of irregularities in procurements made while she was in charge.

Mogale was fired from the NHLS in 2019, along with former CFO Sikhumbuzo Zulu, after the conclusion of a disciplinary hearing. At the time, it was reported that they had been charged with irregularities and failure to fulfil their duties concerning three procurements totalling about R200-million.

“The NHLS always felt that the dismissal of Mogale and Zulu was absolutely fair and warranted, and we’re very pleased to know that Judge [Connie] Prinsloo has confirmed not just the fairness of the dismissal, but she [also] made some very strong statements about Mogale and Zulu in the judgment,” said Prof Eric Buch, chairperson of the NHLS board.

“It vindicates the efforts and the commitment to clean governance and to holding people accountable for what they’ve done. It’s very important that public entities don’t make deals with mutual settlements and non-disclosure... when faced with situations like this.”

Although Zulu joined Mogale in her application to the Labour Court, he died before proceedings could begin and was substituted by Masello Zulu in her capacity as executrix of his estate.

The damages


In the judgment handed down on 13 September 2024, Mogale and Zulu’s estate were found to be jointly liable to pay the NHLS R342,545 due to their handling of a tender for the provision of Multiprotocol Label Switching wide area network services, awarded to the company DV8 Consulting CC in 2016.

According to the ruling, the NHLS board approved the awarding of a tender for the amount of R85,449,243 to DV8 Consulting CC. However, Mogale later entered into an addendum to the service level agreement, allocating an additional amount of R63.5m. This was not approved by the board. Zulu was found culpable for recommending the additional contract without any tender process.

The court ordered Mogale to pay an additional sum of R22,135,346 to the NHLS concerning a tender for the leasing of motor vehicles for the public entity, awarded to the company Afrirent (Pty) Ltd in 2016. Mogale reportedly entered into a service-level agreement of R79,691,269 with the company without taking the matter to the board for approval.

“Ms Mogale conceded that the Afrirent contract was not referred to the Board for approval but testified that she was asked by the SCM [supply chain management] to sign the agreement, not to submit it anywhere,” stated the court. 

The NHLS made a third claim for damages in relation to a tender for the supply, maintenance and service of end-user computer hardware, awarded to Blue Future Internet and Surveillance (Pty) Ltd in 2016.

Mogale entered into a service level agreement for the amount of R83,902,000, despite the fact that the board had approved the tender for an amount of R25,985,921. However, the court noted that while there were “serious irregularities” in the Blue Future contract, no evidence was presented showing that the NHLS had suffered damages.

“This case shows how important it is to have skilled, competent and qualified people employed in key positions and how devastating the consequences are if a CEO or CFO is not up for the task,” said the court. 

“... it has been demonstrated that during their conduct relating to each of the three contractors… Mr Zulu and Ms Mogale failed to perform their duties effectively, efficiently and professionally, and instead displayed severe negligence and incompetence, resulting in damage to the NHLS.”


‘Blind leading the blind’


In her judgment, Prinsloo noted that the irregularities in the three tenders painted a “concerning picture” of an entity where control and accountability were inadequate.

“The way in which Ms Mogale, Mr Zulu and their subordinates operated and advised, reminds this Court of the proverbial blind leading the blind,” she said.

Buch told Daily Maverick that Mogale and Zulu misled the board, including failing to bring procurements that were above their delegation to the body. He added that the NHLS was of the view that there was a group of executives and senior managers who were colluding to circumvent controls and procedures at the public entity during that time.

“These were in 2016, largely, and we picked them up early in 2017… Since 2017, the NHLS has moved to implement a range of interventions and control measures to prevent precisely the kind of weaknesses that the judge speaks about,” he said.

The NHLS was “very pleased” with the damages of R22-million, according to Buch, especially as, in these types of cases, there was a need to draw an absolute link between the irregularity and the losses incurred.

According to the judgment, Mogale testified that the criticism against her was unfair as she was “very thorough”. She reportedly said that she had been waiting for seven years to hear what she had done wrong, as her life had been “turned upside down” by the proceedings.

“Ms Mogale was unable to acknowledge her role in creating her own misery – she was constantly shifting the blame, even onto the media,” stated the judgment.

There is an ongoing criminal case against Mogale for alleged contraventions of the Public Finance Management Act in relation to her actions at the NHLS.

Mogale told Daily Maverick she was consulting her lawyers following the judgment. She pointed out that the NHLS’s initial counterclaim was R236-million rather than the R22-million awarded.

“I am categorically against the judgment. Having said that, I am still going to consult my legal representatives on the way forward. The difference between the initial R236-million litigation and the now R22-million should tell you something about this case,” she said. DM

Comments

lpanton57 Sep 17, 2024, 04:58 AM

It tells me you're lucky it's reduced to only 22mil. Is there any public service corner that has no corruption present???

Lynda Tyrer Sep 17, 2024, 09:08 AM

I didnt understand that either would she have preferred the R236ml to pay back instead ?

Robert de Vos Sep 17, 2024, 09:51 AM

No.

mdr.solutions Sep 17, 2024, 06:23 AM

It is sad to see how South African institutions were been ransacked.

J vN Sep 17, 2024, 06:36 AM

And another huge DEI success story. Big surprise.

ath Sep 17, 2024, 03:05 PM

Precisely. It's just sickening to see the depths of depravity and corruption in this country.

Walter Spatula Sep 17, 2024, 07:05 AM

Sadly, she might be just grossly incompetent rather than corrupt.

Peter Relleen Sep 17, 2024, 08:18 AM

It is a fact of life that those who do wrong do not see it in themselves. Often, they castigate, vociferously, those people that show them the error of their ways.

michele35 Sep 17, 2024, 12:28 PM

Is accepting a position for which you are not qualified, not corruption in itself? Fake CV's, degrees from unknown educational institutions are the order of the day until disaster strikes. The risk of personal liability is what will deter incompetents and the corrupt.

franckmit Sep 17, 2024, 07:21 AM

Are there any non corrupt people in government entities, being corrupt seems to be a prerequisite.

ath Sep 17, 2024, 03:06 PM

No

Richard Blake Sep 18, 2024, 08:52 PM

Corruption and dereliction of duty is a basic requirement in the ANC.

Ian Gwilt Sep 17, 2024, 07:25 AM

I do not see anything linking her with the tenders Only gross incompetence, if no benefit where will she get 22 Mill from ?

Rod MacLeod Sep 17, 2024, 09:12 AM

Whether she has R22m or not is irrelevant. She caused the department massive losses through her wrongful actions, and therefore is liable for those losses. She still faces charges under the PFM Act - and that tells you something too.

Mahendra Dabideen Sep 17, 2024, 11:48 AM

If you dont see something, doesnt mean its not there.....

Rudolf Van Beerschoten Van Beerschoten Sep 17, 2024, 07:34 AM

Sufficiently incompetent to be able to come up with R22m to pay the damages…

Kb1066 . Sep 17, 2024, 08:03 AM

I wonder why the labour court is ruling on procurement irregularities

kgaboe Sep 17, 2024, 08:44 AM

Exactly

Rod MacLeod Sep 17, 2024, 09:15 AM

Wondering "why" means you have no idea of the nexus between job performance and committing irregularities / fraud in execution of your job.

louw.nic Sep 17, 2024, 04:27 PM

I see a performance review in your professional future...

Cachunk Sep 17, 2024, 08:04 AM

Another anc waste of Oxygen.

William Kelly Sep 17, 2024, 08:17 AM

About time. Personal damages. Great idea!

Hendrik van Zyl Sep 17, 2024, 08:38 AM

No shame! Absolutely disgraceful conduct by these individuals.

duncarion5 Sep 17, 2024, 08:43 AM

It really boggles the mind that the connected deal in millions of Rand, unlike the average citizen deals in hundreds. After forty years in a well paid job my pension is well under half what she is being instructed to pay back.

William Kelly Sep 17, 2024, 08:45 AM

I suspect that what's happened here is that the good lady has not yet comprehended that it is in fact she, and not the department she headed, that is liable for this payment.

Andrew Mckenzie Sep 17, 2024, 09:12 AM

Well yes. What are the chances of getting the money from her?

ath Sep 17, 2024, 03:07 PM

Zero

Hilary Morris Sep 17, 2024, 09:24 AM

What's new? "I didn't do anything wrong, and if I did, I was allowed to, and if I wasn't, I should have been!" Next she'll be hiring Mpofu to explain that just because she was found guilty, doesn't mean she shouldn't still be rewarded. Such a sad reflection on S.A. Renewal se voet!

M D Fraser Sep 17, 2024, 10:06 AM

Anyone want to bet NHLS never sees any of this money? Anyone else want to bet there'll be no further consequences for Ms Mogale ? Same- same !

middelhov Sep 17, 2024, 10:16 AM

This is a fantastic judgement, setting precedent for personal financial liability for mismanagement if a big step in the right direction and hopefully opens the door to similar judgements against munciple managers councilors etc.

derekbun176 Sep 17, 2024, 12:57 PM

Corruption Corruption again These individuals are a disgrace Always the Combrats When this news comes up l know exactly who are the culprits before l even read the full story very disturbing no Principles or Morals l tell you

D'Esprit Dan Sep 17, 2024, 01:41 PM

Not only should she pay back the money, she should go to prison for at least 10 years, without parole. Disappointing, but hopefully if more thieves are brought to book, we'll at least stop the hemorrhaging of money from the public purse.

cwf51 Sep 17, 2024, 01:53 PM

Took ANC 5 years to get a court ruling for fraud of about R22Million - how long will it take the GNU (ANC + 12 other parties) to take Zuma and Guptas to court for th eabout R23+ Billion that they STOLE?

Relentless One Sep 17, 2024, 02:28 PM

CADRES as usual. Not to worry...she will soon plead complete POVERTY (While all the stolen money sits offshore somewhere in someone else's name). They simply can't help themselves!!!

Philip Machanick Sep 17, 2024, 09:05 PM

The award against her was 10% of what she said it should be. She should definitely appeal. I like this precedent. We must ensure that the outcome is thorough and generally applicable.

Paul Caiger Sep 18, 2024, 03:53 PM

"Her life had been “turned upside down” . Fantastic. I hope your life it continues and your cadres don't come to bail you out. No money + no influence = ANC cadres will desert you . If you can't pay , go to jail. No remorse shown ; Good riddance to another ANC incompetent