Dailymaverick logo

Maverick News

This article is more than a year old

Maverick News

Axed DA MP Renaldo Gouws to explore legal, ethical challenge to membership termination

Despite repeatedly using the k-word and the n-word – derogatory terms used during the apartheid era – Renaldo Gouws believes the party’s decision to sack him is driven by factors beyond the merits of his case.
Axed DA MP Renaldo Gouws to explore legal, ethical challenge to membership termination

The DA’s highest decision-making body, the Federal Executive, has unanimously decided to terminate the membership of its controversial MP, Renaldo Gouws, effectively ending his brief three-month career as a parliamentarian. 

The decision follows a comprehensive investigation by the party’s Federal Legal Commission.  

Gouws was in hot water for racist videos in which he repeatedly called South Africans the k-word and the n-word – derogatory terms used during the apartheid era – which he took about 15 years ago which resurfaced in June following his swearing-in at the National Assembly as part of the seventh administration

In a statement at the weekend, national spokesperson and MP Willie Aucamp said Gouws has been formally informed of the decision to terminate his membership.

“He therefore forfeits his Democratic Alliance seat in Parliament. This decision follows a thorough investigation conducted by the DA’s Federal Legal Commission (FLC) into the allegations against Mr Gouws. The FLC found Mr Gouws guilty of contravening several sections of the DA’s constitution.”

This effectively means that Gouws, who previously served as a Nelson Mandela Bay councillor, will forfeit several taxpayer-funded benefits, including an annual R1.27-million (more than R100,000 a month) salary, subsidised medical aid and free flights.

Gouws has since indicated he will explore all avenues available to him to challenge the termination of his membership.  

“I would like to emphasise that this is not the end. I will be exploring all legal and ethical options available to me to challenge this decision and clear my name. My commitment to my work and the people I serve remains my top priority,” he said. 

Gouws said the party’s decision was disheartening and “fails to reflect the full context of my actions and my dedication to my role as a public representative. It’s also disheartening that something I said 15 years ago, and completely taken out of context, is held against me as if it was said over the last year.”  

Read more: DA suspends Renaldo Gouws over racist language video 

Gouws also claimed the party’s stance appeared to be motivated by factors beyond the merits of the case against him. “However, I will continue to stand firm in my beliefs and convictions; it seems few are willing to do this, with cancel culture at an all-time high and with the terms ‘racist’ and ‘bigot’ being thrown around without consequence.”

In the video, Gouws is heard saying: “Alright, so there’s a couple of things I want to say. Kill the f**ing k*ffirs, kill all the f*ing n*ggers. That’s all I gotta f*ing say. Kill all the k*ffirs! Kill all the f*ing n*ggers!”

When the party called him to account, Gouws was said to have claimed that the video had been fake and possibly taken using modern technology such as AI tools. 

He said at the time: “I refute any claims of racism or being a racist. I can, however, see how my message was distorted in the way it was delivered by me and I take full responsibility for the actions of my younger and immature self. For that, I apologise unreservedly.”  

Gouws’s incident is similar to that of a South African man, Adam Catzavelos, who in 2018 recorded himself making racist comments about the lack of black people in his surroundings.

While on holiday abroad, Catzavelos filmed himself saying: “Not one k***r in sight, f**king heaven on Earth… You cannot beat this!” 

In response, the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) fined Catzevelos R200,000 in 2019 and mandated an apology. Much like Gouws, Catzavelos lost his job at his family’s business. The SAHRC is also pursuing legal action against Gouws on the grounds that his utterances "constitute hate speech and/or harassment as contemplated in terms of sections 10 and 11 of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 2000 (PEPUDA or Equality Act)."

Gouws’s videos led to an online petition on Change.org in which more than 53,000 people called for his removal. 

The firing of Gouws also comes fresh off the heels of DA party leader and now Minister of Agriculture John Steenhuizen asking his newly appointed controversial chief of staff, Roman Cabanac, to resign. 

Read more: Reflective Steenhuisen asks Roman Cabanac to quit after internal DA backlash and public outrage

Read more: By rewarding Roman Cabanac’s bigotry, Steenhuisen risks the future of the GNU

Steenhuisen had been facing increasing pressure from within the DA and from the public. The DA leader initially defended the appointment of Cabanac, who is known to be a divisive and race-baiting figure, on the grounds of Cabanac’s legal experience. However, at a briefing with the Cape Town Press Council last Thursday, he said: “In hindsight, there should’ve been a little bit more due diligence done. In hindsight, there should have been greater foresight.DM

Comments

Amos J Sep 15, 2024, 12:42 PM

Oh Renaldo stop this nonsense. If they don't want you, they don't want you!

jcscholtz123 Sep 15, 2024, 01:34 PM

I think it is best for DA to part ways. But DM not giving full context. He used it to illustrate the hurtfullness of kill the boer. I think whatever the context you cannot say it, but DM should really provide full context. Court found that IOL was wrong. DM surely do not want to be same as IOL?

andij8537 Sep 16, 2024, 01:29 AM

Spot on... Its likely that Gouws will convince many to support his action against the DA

bigbad jon Sep 16, 2024, 07:07 AM

Very one-sided report, Njilo is amazingly biased. She should work for IOL, that's her level of 'journalism'..

Gugu1 K Sep 16, 2024, 11:28 AM

Not black person approves of the "kill the boer" chant. But everybody who's black is offended by the use of the K-world.

D'Esprit Dan Sep 16, 2024, 11:38 AM

Well said!

Gugu1 K Sep 16, 2024, 11:39 AM

Not every black person approves of the "kill the boer" chant. But everybody who's black is offended by the use of the K-word.

Malcolm McManus Sep 16, 2024, 01:01 PM

Stadiums full of people approve of, and chant kill the boer. The difference is the Judicial system allows this. They certainly don't approve of the use of the "K" nor "N" word or even references to monkeys. These are jail-able offenses if you're white. This is fact. All undesirable in our era.

hlavatican Sep 15, 2024, 01:42 PM

Renaldo either join Action SA a party of the aggrieved, or Start your Party, or start a new podcast advocating for unity to show have changed... 2026 they will have you back... for now it's over.

Grumpy Old Man Sep 15, 2024, 05:46 PM

Kids; Stay in school, practice safe sex, don't do drugs and whatever you do - stay clear of Twitter (X)

graemebirddurban Sep 15, 2024, 06:59 PM

and racists

Alan Salmon Sep 15, 2024, 07:49 PM

Good riddance to Gouws and Cabanac - if the DA wants to attract new young members from all races we cannot tolerate this old time racism.

Keith Wilson Sep 16, 2024, 07:12 AM

Spot on. At least the DA make an attempt to clean up the messes they make (and the Cabanac appointment was a great steaming pile of it!). Still some double standards at play though - racism in the other direction doesn't seem to be dealt with at all - "Kill the Boer" comes to mind. Ho Hum.

Harold Porter Sep 16, 2024, 07:45 AM

Did you ever watch the full video or read the text of the full video?

ttshililo2 Sep 16, 2024, 07:44 AM

What a sad little man. James Balwin was correct: “ I imagine one of the reasons people cling to their hates so stubbornly is because they sense, once hate is gone, they will be forced to deal with pain.”

Harold Porter Sep 16, 2024, 07:52 AM

Did you ever watch the full video? He's actual point was that racist language is not right, and he was using shock value and irony to make his point.

ttshililo2 Sep 16, 2024, 08:01 AM

Harold, have a good day.

Harold Porter Sep 16, 2024, 09:28 AM

And you too, good sir.

Sydney Kaye Sep 16, 2024, 07:49 AM

Of course there are other factors at least. Bringing the party into disrepute, for example. The DA is at the cross roads and can't have distractions like this giving ammunition to its opponents.

Harold Porter Sep 16, 2024, 07:50 AM

Seeing as though DM won't provide the context, I will: Gouws starts his video saying 'kill the K*****', etc., but he's using rhetorical irony. The actual point of his video is that any use of such language is unacceptable, even if it's 'kill the boer'.

Grumpy Old Man Sep 16, 2024, 12:36 PM

Harold, I think most people (on this forum) understand the point he was attempting to make. It's not his point - it's the use of language to make his point - that is unacceptable. Gous has cultivated an X following by by being provocative. Live by the sword die by the sword

Malcolm McManus Sep 16, 2024, 01:04 PM

Works well for Julius, without the repercussions.

Willem Boshoff Sep 16, 2024, 01:39 PM

Spot on. Gouws is known for his apartheid denialism (equated EE policies with apartheid policies) and endless spats with EFF supporters. Gouws' remarks have been taken terribly out of context but he didn't apologise for a lot of his offensive/insensitive behaviour - remains a bad fit for the DA.

Harold Porter Sep 16, 2024, 02:57 PM

It's one thing to say that he's too controversial and therefore a bad fit (fair enough), but it's not fair for the article to claim he 'made a racist video', when the thrust of the video was clearly condemning racism.

Grumpy Old Man Sep 16, 2024, 06:24 PM

Which is a point Mr Gouws could have still made without using the 'K' or 'N' words. It is my belief his use of these words was 'deliberate' to his purpose and to find currency amongst those following him. His was less a protest than incitement

Harold Porter Sep 16, 2024, 02:55 PM

I have no problem with people catching flak for actually being racist. I don't agree that someone should be fired for merely saying a particular word.

D'Esprit Dan Sep 16, 2024, 04:19 PM

You can't be serious. Do you live in South Africa and know its history? You clearly don't understand our history and its nuances.

Harold Porter Sep 16, 2024, 05:19 PM

There's a difference between saying a word in passing reference, and directing it to someone as an insult. For instance, if you read contemporary Muslim accounts of the Crusades, you'll find that refer to the Crusaders as K*****s. Reading those passages out loud does not make you racist.

Kid Charlemagne Sep 16, 2024, 12:41 PM

Is the deeper point completely whizzing over your head?

D'Esprit Dan Sep 16, 2024, 04:21 PM

Yes, it certainly is!

louw.nic Sep 16, 2024, 08:52 AM

It's Monday, and that means more clickbait from DM. Is there ANY form of fact-checking or sub-editing of articles for FACTUAL ACCURACY?

megapode Sep 16, 2024, 08:56 AM

This whole business is a mess. Gouws didn't help himself by telling Zille that it had to be AI. Did he forget about that infamous video that he has least twice made apologies for? Question: What checks can a party reasonably be expected to make before putting somebody forward for MP?

D'Esprit Dan Sep 16, 2024, 09:33 AM

Another utterly innocuous post rejected here. It's not bad enough that we're restricted to 300 characters, but now it seems a handful of characters are rejecting any posts they don't agree with, rather than debating them. Very sad that DM's laudable peer-review has been hijacked like this!

Karl Sittlinger Sep 16, 2024, 10:46 AM

I definitely let comments through that I don't agree with, unless I am sure that the comment is misinfo or purposefully ommits info, has a major fallacy or an ad hominem attack is executed. 300 chars DM why? After multiple mails I finally got a standard response that u are sorry, no explanation.

D'Esprit Dan Sep 16, 2024, 11:41 AM

Yip, even comments that are misleading I'll let through so they can be exposed. Some readers clearly can't take criticism of their heroes though.

Neil T. Sep 16, 2024, 10:16 AM

While I do not condone or agree with Gous' views and comments, I am massively concerned that hate speech is permitted by the SAHRC (if it is said by members of the ANC and EFF), but not by others. If we want to move forward, we need consistency and fairness for all South Africans.

Indeed Jhb Sep 16, 2024, 10:36 AM

Agreef

Indeed Jhb Sep 16, 2024, 10:37 AM

Agreed

Indeed Jhb Sep 16, 2024, 10:48 AM

Was Gouws a member of the DA 15 years ago? How has he conducted himself and his portfolio as a DA member? While the DA is culling out anyone that might have 'said hurtful things' the ANC is still protective of its ?? members. Bit of a one sided 'ethical and clean' government expectation not?

D'Esprit Dan Sep 16, 2024, 11:44 AM

Optics and history: the DA is widely (and wrongly) accused of being a party of white privilege, so they have to work twice as hard to dispel that notion than the ANC does of being a kleptocratic crony party. Not that hte ANC cares what anyone thinks, other than a few weeks before elections!

Malcolm McManus Sep 16, 2024, 01:09 PM

Race bias is a global phenomena. Some races draw protection. One doesn't. Not likely to change any time soon.

D'Esprit Dan Sep 16, 2024, 04:25 PM

Malcolm, that race basically eliminated the native populations of 3 continents and colonised and/or enslaved those in Asia, Africa and the Middle East for 3 centuries. And still controls the global economy and agenda. It's hardly surprising they get short shift.

Harold Porter Sep 16, 2024, 05:21 PM

Weren't you the one concerned with 'nuance'...your take on world history isn't very 'nuanced'

D'Esprit Dan Sep 17, 2024, 11:25 AM

Nuance is a little tricky in 300 words, but it's pretty accurate, outside of little echo chambers in South Africa (and Trumpland).

Harold Porter Sep 16, 2024, 05:27 PM

1. So if 'enslaving others' legitimises being the target of racism, then we can be racist against Arabs, because they are by far the world leaders (whereas 10 million Africans were enslaved by Europeans, about 19 million were enslaved by Arabs)

D'Esprit Dan Sep 17, 2024, 11:27 AM

I've no idea why the Arab slave trade gets off so lightly, but I also never said it's a legitimate reason for racism - I said it's hardly surprising that they get short shrift. Basically, little sympathy from other races. Sorry you didn't understand.

Harold Porter Sep 16, 2024, 05:31 PM

2. If inadvertently introducing diseases that wipe out populations makes one a fair target for racism, then we can be racist against the Chinese, because the various bubonic plagues and several flu strains were spread by them.

D'Esprit Dan Sep 17, 2024, 11:32 AM

It wasn't only disease that wiped out populations, and it certainly wasn't disease that confined native populations to reservations in the USA and Canada, or enacted the genocide in Australia (Australian Museum term, not mine) or the one in Namibia, for one closer to home. It was colonial policy.

Harold Porter Sep 16, 2024, 05:34 PM

3. And if one can pick on an ethnic group because of their disproportionate economic power....well....where have we heard that before? Let's just say it begins with an N and ends in an azi.

D'Esprit Dan Sep 17, 2024, 11:33 AM

You're clutching at straws and cherry picking at the same time - quite an accomplishment. Read the whole post, in context.

Malcolm McManus Sep 16, 2024, 05:40 PM

Does getting protection really help though by giving advantage. It seems to just make those with less advantages all the more stronger in the long run. How do we truly break the cycle.

Harold Porter Sep 16, 2024, 06:05 PM

2. If inadvertently introducing diseases that wipe out populations makes one a fair target for racism, then can we be racist against the Chinese, because the various bubonic plagues and several flu strains were spread by them.

Arnold O Managra Sep 16, 2024, 09:34 PM

> that race basically eliminated the native populations of 3 continents Let me count them, and "eliminated" is a strong word, let alone broader association of race with skin colour. North America? I get one with some nuance. Asia and Africa in particular have flourished population-wise.

D'Esprit Dan Sep 17, 2024, 11:37 AM

South America (most South Americans today are descendants of Europeans or slaves, ironically, with the indigenous population across Latin America estimated at 8% of the total). And Australia - genocide reduced their population from 1.5m to <100k, according to the Australian Museum.

caseyare Sep 16, 2024, 10:53 AM

There is no doubt a special place for this correspondent at IOL, but should not be one as a DM reporter. This should not have been presented as a report, but as an opinion piece. And, to be clear, I am highly critical of the DA’s handling of this whole debacle.

Diana Clarke Sep 16, 2024, 12:46 PM

White people also don't like the K or N word by the way...despite public opinion.

Skinyela Sep 16, 2024, 04:40 PM

Most or all?

Jennifer D Sep 16, 2024, 01:17 PM

The fact that the leader of the EFF is allowed to sing racist songs inciting killing of white people and he is not even reprimanded but someone using derogatory language loses his job, is incredibly hypercritical. Why dont we stop all racism in this country? ANC policies perpetuate it.

Malcolm McManus Sep 16, 2024, 02:25 PM

We have a legal/ judicial system that can go to the ICJ with the biggest moral compass on the globe when it comes to genocide, but that same system can ignore the likes of Julius inciting genocide. Ironical. Yet the world cannot see this irony.

Malcolm McManus Sep 16, 2024, 02:45 PM

Although the momentum appears to have tapered off after the elections.

Noelsoyizwap Sep 16, 2024, 09:39 PM

“I will continue to stand firm in my beliefs and convictions; it seems few are willing to do this.” Gouws is clearly not a DM comments section reader, if he was, he wouldn't have made this statement.

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso Sep 16, 2024, 10:06 PM

In politics your entire job is to persuade and win people over. You have miscalculated. It happens, and you are paying the price. Regardless of your subjective "right-ness", as soon as lawyers need to enter the frame I question whether your position is worth pursuing.