Dailymaverick logo

DM168

This article is more than a year old

DM168

Defence Forces 101 - Five steps Minister Angie Motshekga must take to fix South Africa's SANDF

Minister Angie Motshekga, now that you have been pushed from basic education to defence, here are five things you can do to make a difference. Take this to heart: any effort at improvement will be a step in the right direction.
Defence Forces 101 - Five steps Minister Angie Motshekga must take to fix South Africa's SANDF Dear Minister Angie Motshekga, So, the elections are done and you’ve just been appointed by your government to run the country’s Department of Defence. As you have zero experience in military affairs, the criticism of you is widespread and voluminous. But fret not! You need not be a bemedalled field marshal to run the department at the highest level. In fact, in many cases, that can be a bit of a liability. Ask a fighter pilot about the logistics requirements – at a policy level – of an artillery brigade and they’ll likely come up mute, or ask for more aircraft. We do need more aircraft, but don’t worry about that just yet. So, with 15 years of covering the defence beat in South Africa, here are my top five things that should be on your defence minister dream board. [caption id="attachment_2271060" align="alignnone" width="2560"] Soldiers from the SANDF with the South African Police Service patrol Khayelitsha hotspots on 22 July 2021 in Cape Town, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Brenton Geach)[/caption] [caption id="attachment_2271071" align="alignnone" width="2560"] A South African Police Service (SAPS) and South African National Defence Force (SANDF) joint operation on illegal mining in Durban Deep on 29 November 2023 in Roodepoort, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Sharon Seretlo)[/caption]

1. Start a new defence review today

The country’s defence forces are in dire need of a new defence review. The last one started in about 2012 and continued into legislative reality. The massive document contained every detail about how the defence force, the defence industry and the civil society around it should be structured. It was truly a magnificent policy document, containing the recommendations of many of the country’s top defence minds. The only problem was that the document hinged on a promise by one of your predecessors, whose name starts with an “L” and ends with “Sisulu”, that the budget to fund this policy was forthcoming. It wasn’t. And it perhaps never was. The tendrils of State Capture were already well within defence, and with the South African economy tanking harder than a Leopard 2 in eastern Ukraine (that is an armour joke), there was never any consideration beyond the Department of Defence for more budget to fund the country’s defined goals for the future. This has left the South African National Defence Force (SANDF), and the attached organisations, in a complete free-fall to the bottom. And, as minister, it’s probably useful to know from the start that the “bottom” in defence equates to literal lives lost. That’s where we are now in 2024. At the bottom, or certainly starting to circle the drain. So, for the first action as minister, for the love of God, commission the start of a new defence review. Except, this time, let’s base it in reality: that the defence budget will not significantly increase and that it may in fact decline. How do you do this? Well, fortunately, your deputy minister (Brigadier (ret) Holomisa, not the other one) can be a big help in this regard. And, since you’re now friends with the GNU-DA, perhaps consult with the former DA spokesperson on defence, Kobus Marais. There are people around you with a wealth of knowledge and experience who can quickly help in getting this very im­­portant ball rolling. Hell, send me an email. I have some ideas too. Which leads to step two. [caption id="attachment_2271059" align="alignnone" width="2560"] Members of the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) inspect Ndofaya Mall after the looting and violent protests on 21 July 2021 in Soweto, South Africa. The violent protests spread from KwaZulu-Natal after the incarceration of the former president Jacob Zuma. (Photo: Gallo Images / Sharon Seretlo)[/caption]

2. Ignore your generals and talk to the junior officers and enlisted personnel

Your officer cadre have some good eggs there. But, by and large, many are long due for retirement. For them and their R80,000 per month salaries (plus benefits), the status quo is just fine. Like any military, the real heart and soul of your newfound ministry lies in the sergeants, the corporals, the captains and the majors. Perhaps some colonels too, while we’re at it, but really it’s the youth in the defence force who are the driven, ambitious go-getters and can give you a no-bullshit assessment of how things are going. Set up a road show, send your staff to chat with these ranks across branches, and without their superiors present, and get some frank, honest feedback on the real state of the defence forces. You’ll soon get a picture of everything from the toilet paper quality to the outdated avionics software on our fighter jets. This information is invaluable, and you won’t find it in a 300-slide deck from a general. In all my years of speaking with our soldiers from various ranks, it’s always been the junior officers (lieutenant to major) and the NCOs (that’s a corporal or sergeant in normie terms) who have the bright ideas. If you want to know how it was, speak to your senior commanders. If you want to know how it is and could be, speak to the rest. Why is this important? Well, as a perceived “outsider” with no experience in this world, that kind of information is termed 'Situational Awareness' in military parlance. It helps to lift the fog of war around the SANDF and empowers you with the God’s honest truth about the state of things among the rank and file. Also, it helps you to avoid the bullshit. Which leads to step three. [caption id="attachment_2271058" align="alignnone" width="2560"] Angie Motshekga during the swearing-in ceremony of the new national executive members at Cape Town International Convention Centre on 3 July 2024 in Cape Town, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Misha Jordaan)[/caption]

3. Avoid the bullshit

Now several weeks into your tenure as defence minister, you’ve probably already been fêted by every Tom, Dick and Sally punting anything from the Panzer-smasher 3000 to the Rebel-defeater MkIII system. You’ll be hounded from pillar to post by the “industry” internally (Armscor, Denel) and externally (Russia, America, China, your cousin with an engineering diploma), all pushing some wonder tool or other. To explain: there are certainly many tools of defence that need acquiring or modernisation, and many of the recommendations you receive will be good ones. But they are all delivered under the current state of the defence force, in isolation from other branches and their needs, and heedless of just how limited the budget truly is. Fortunately, you’ve taken this article to heart and already implemented Step 1. In commissioning a new defence review, a lot of this bullshit will be weeded out and the real needs of a future defence force can be laid out in a clear, sane way. The defence budget is down to the marrow inside the bone now, and there are simply no resources to waste on stupid acquisitions. Indeed, if you’ve done your job well over the next five years or so, or until the GNU explodes, you will have removed entire lines of equipment and their costs. That might irk some of your generals, but thankfully you’ve also read Step 2 and are not really paying too much mind to their brass-chested grumblings. Avoiding the bullshit will also let you have your house in order when you turn to Step 4. [caption id="attachment_2271073" align="alignnone" width="2560"] The SANDF during Day 1 of the Rand Show at Johannesburg Expo Centre Nasrec on 28 March 2024 in Johannesburg, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Frennie Shivambu)[/caption]

4. Sit down with Treasury and explain to them how to ‘military’

National Treasury has historically treated the defence department like any other. Unfortunately, this translates into arbitrary budget assignments and oversight that simply make no sense in the defence context. Why, for example, does Treasury have a say in how the UN refunds from our SANDF deployment to the DRC are allocated, and when? There is a dire need to sit down with Treasury and work out a budgetary framework that recognises the unique nature of defence and that its spending requirements cannot be cherry-picked by non-Department of Defence non-experts, and perhaps figure out what this looks like in writing. Even a memorandum of understanding at this point would be helpful in clearing that up. Treasury is treating your department with a funding horizon that spans a year or three. In defence, anything under 10 years is rushed. Your budgets should look that way. So piecemeal funding priorities do not always take precedence over the longer-term requirements. We have shiny new uniforms, for example, but a critical underfunding in transport aircraft. One can be done quickly, and the other takes decades to un­­tangle fully. Explain this to the bean-counters. And then make them sign something to agree to change things. Once tea is finished with Treasury, your next appointment is waiting: [caption id="attachment_2271069" align="alignnone" width="1956"] A sailor during the Women's Month commemoration at Air Force Mobile Deployment Wing in Valhalla on 25 August 2023 in Pretoria, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Frennie Shivambu)[/caption]

5. Decide who the police force is

The SANDF has long been the whipping boy for the police force’s failings. Everyone from the government to the former-opposition DA screams for the SANDF to deploy to the streets to fight gangs, defeat Covid, watch the borders and guard substations or, in the latest tragic case, abandoned mineshafts. This is all South African Police Service work. The SANDF has been doing a lot of these tasks without the funding to do so. The result is what we witnessed this month, with soldiers potentially self-asphyxiating while guarding a mineshaft from zama zamas. Better training and cold-weather equipment would have prevented this from happening. So too if the police were doing this job. Or, hell, maybe even private security. This tragedy could have been avoided with a duty officer or NCO paying attention, sending radio checks regularly, even actually inspecting the guards to make sure they were awake. None of this appeared to have happened or, if it did, was not done enough. The best way to fix this is simply not to do it. It’s police work, or it’s private security work. Ordinary soldiers neither have the power of arrest, nor do they have any of the other training a police officer has. So, why make it your problem? As defence minister, you can quickly fix this by simply opting not to do it. The SANDF’s role as the police-with-teeth needs to end, or it needs to receive whatever the police’s budget is for this instead. Soldiers are meant to defend the nation from internal and external threats, not chase fence-jumping undocumented migrants or guard mineshafts in freezing containers. It might be tempting to take on these tasks to maintain “usefulness” by the government. And there may well be occasion for the military to intervene in assisting the police. But this relationship has now become abusive, and it’s time to pack bags and leave it. Take heart. The position of defence minister does not need to be an arduous quest resulting in outright quiet-quitting by you and your staff. Think of it as a ministry that has sunk to rock bottom, and any kind of effort at improvement would be a step in the right direction. These steps are relatively easy to achieve in a political sense. They just require a bit of delegation, ministerial staff who won’t eat the crayons, and a thick skin to take all the inevitable criticism. Our budget is minuscule, but there are many countries across the globe that have done amazing things with similar figures. You might need to sell off some equipment, and forcefully retire some of the old and lame from the upper ranks, but all of this is very doable. DM John Stupart is Daily Maverick’s newsletter editor. He is the co-founder of the African Defence Review. He holds a master's degree in War Studies from King’s College, London.

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.

Dear Minister Angie Motshekga,

So, the elections are done and you’ve just been appointed by your government to run the country’s Department of Defence. As you have zero experience in military affairs, the criticism of you is widespread and voluminous.

But fret not! You need not be a bemedalled field marshal to run the department at the highest level. In fact, in many cases, that can be a bit of a liability. Ask a fighter pilot about the logistics requirements – at a policy level – of an artillery brigade and they’ll likely come up mute, or ask for more aircraft.

We do need more aircraft, but don’t worry about that just yet.

So, with 15 years of covering the defence beat in South Africa, here are my top five things that should be on your defence minister dream board.

Soldiers from the SANDF with the South African Police Service patrol Khayelitsha hotspots on 22 July 2021 in Cape Town, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Brenton Geach)



A South African Police Service (SAPS) and South African National Defence Force (SANDF) joint operation on illegal mining in Durban Deep on 29 November 2023 in Roodepoort, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Sharon Seretlo)


1. Start a new defence review today


The country’s defence forces are in dire need of a new defence review. The last one started in about 2012 and continued into legislative reality. The massive document contained every detail about how the defence force, the defence industry and the civil society around it should be structured.

It was truly a magnificent policy document, containing the recommendations of many of the country’s top defence minds.

The only problem was that the document hinged on a promise by one of your predecessors, whose name starts with an “L” and ends with “Sisulu”, that the budget to fund this policy was forthcoming.

It wasn’t. And it perhaps never was. The tendrils of State Capture were already well within defence, and with the South African economy tanking harder than a Leopard 2 in eastern Ukraine (that is an armour joke), there was never any consideration beyond the Department of Defence for more budget to fund the country’s defined goals for the future.

This has left the South African National Defence Force (SANDF), and the attached organisations, in a complete free-fall to the bottom. And, as minister, it’s probably useful to know from the start that the “bottom” in defence equates to literal lives lost.

That’s where we are now in 2024. At the bottom, or certainly starting to circle the drain.

So, for the first action as minister, for the love of God, commission the start of a new defence review.

Except, this time, let’s base it in reality: that the defence budget will not significantly increase and that it may in fact decline.

How do you do this? Well, fortunately, your deputy minister (Brigadier (ret) Holomisa, not the other one) can be a big help in this regard. And, since you’re now friends with the GNU-DA, perhaps consult with the former DA spokesperson on defence, Kobus Marais. There are people around you with a wealth of knowledge and experience who can quickly help in getting this very im­­portant ball rolling. Hell, send me an email. I have some ideas too.

Which leads to step two.

Members of the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) inspect Ndofaya Mall after the looting and violent protests on 21 July 2021 in Soweto, South Africa. The violent protests spread from KwaZulu-Natal after the incarceration of the former president Jacob Zuma. (Photo: Gallo Images / Sharon Seretlo)


2. Ignore your generals and talk to the junior officers and enlisted personnel


Your officer cadre have some good eggs there. But, by and large, many are long due for retirement. For them and their R80,000 per month salaries (plus benefits), the status quo is just fine.

Like any military, the real heart and soul of your newfound ministry lies in the sergeants, the corporals, the captains and the majors. Perhaps some colonels too, while we’re at it, but really it’s the youth in the defence force who are the driven, ambitious go-getters and can give you a no-bullshit assessment of how things are going.

Set up a road show, send your staff to chat with these ranks across branches, and without their superiors present, and get some frank, honest feedback on the real state of the defence forces.

You’ll soon get a picture of everything from the toilet paper quality to the outdated avionics software on our fighter jets. This information is invaluable, and you won’t find it in a 300-slide deck from a general.

In all my years of speaking with our soldiers from various ranks, it’s always been the junior officers (lieutenant to major) and the NCOs (that’s a corporal or sergeant in normie terms) who have the bright ideas. If you want to know how it was, speak to your senior commanders. If you want to know how it is and could be, speak to the rest.

Why is this important? Well, as a perceived “outsider” with no experience in this world, that kind of information is termed 'Situational Awareness' in military parlance. It helps to lift the fog of war around the SANDF and empowers you with the God’s honest truth about the state of things among the rank and file.

Also, it helps you to avoid the bullshit. Which leads to step three.

Angie Motshekga during the swearing-in ceremony of the new national executive members at Cape Town International Convention Centre on 3 July 2024 in Cape Town, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Misha Jordaan)


3. Avoid the bullshit


Now several weeks into your tenure as defence minister, you’ve probably already been fêted by every Tom, Dick and Sally punting anything from the Panzer-smasher 3000 to the Rebel-defeater MkIII system. You’ll be hounded from pillar to post by the “industry” internally (Armscor, Denel) and externally (Russia, America, China, your cousin with an engineering diploma), all pushing some wonder tool or other.

To explain: there are certainly many tools of defence that need acquiring or modernisation, and many of the recommendations you receive will be good ones. But they are all delivered under the current state of the defence force, in isolation from other branches and their needs, and heedless of just how limited the budget truly is.

Fortunately, you’ve taken this article to heart and already implemented Step 1. In commissioning a new defence review, a lot of this bullshit will be weeded out and the real needs of a future defence force can be laid out in a clear, sane way.

The defence budget is down to the marrow inside the bone now, and there are simply no resources to waste on stupid acquisitions. Indeed, if you’ve done your job well over the next five years or so, or until the GNU explodes, you will have removed entire lines of equipment and their costs. That might irk some of your generals, but thankfully you’ve also read Step 2 and are not really paying too much mind to their brass-chested grumblings.

Avoiding the bullshit will also let you have your house in order when you turn to Step 4.

The SANDF during Day 1 of the Rand Show at Johannesburg Expo Centre Nasrec on 28 March 2024 in Johannesburg, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Frennie Shivambu)


4. Sit down with Treasury and explain to them how to ‘military’


National Treasury has historically treated the defence department like any other. Unfortunately, this translates into arbitrary budget assignments and oversight that simply make no sense in the defence context.

Why, for example, does Treasury have a say in how the UN refunds from our SANDF deployment to the DRC are allocated, and when?

There is a dire need to sit down with Treasury and work out a budgetary framework that recognises the unique nature of defence and that its spending requirements cannot be cherry-picked by non-Department of Defence non-experts, and perhaps figure out what this looks like in writing. Even a memorandum of understanding at this point would be helpful in clearing that up.

Treasury is treating your department with a funding horizon that spans a year or three. In defence, anything under 10 years is rushed. Your budgets should look that way. So piecemeal funding priorities do not always take precedence over the longer-term requirements. We have shiny new uniforms, for example, but a critical underfunding in transport aircraft. One can be done quickly, and the other takes decades to un­­tangle fully. Explain this to the bean-counters. And then make them sign something to agree to change things.

Once tea is finished with Treasury, your next appointment is waiting:

A sailor during the Women's Month commemoration at Air Force Mobile Deployment Wing in Valhalla on 25 August 2023 in Pretoria, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Frennie Shivambu)


5. Decide who the police force is


The SANDF has long been the whipping boy for the police force’s failings. Everyone from the government to the former-opposition DA screams for the SANDF to deploy to the streets to fight gangs, defeat Covid, watch the borders and guard substations or, in the latest tragic case, abandoned mineshafts.

This is all South African Police Service work. The SANDF has been doing a lot of these tasks without the funding to do so. The result is what we witnessed this month, with soldiers potentially self-asphyxiating while guarding a mineshaft from zama zamas.

Better training and cold-weather equipment would have prevented this from happening. So too if the police were doing this job. Or, hell, maybe even private security.

This tragedy could have been avoided with a duty officer or NCO paying attention, sending radio checks regularly, even actually inspecting the guards to make sure they were awake. None of this appeared to have happened or, if it did, was not done enough.

The best way to fix this is simply not to do it. It’s police work, or it’s private security work. Ordinary soldiers neither have the power of arrest, nor do they have any of the other training a police officer has. So, why make it your problem? As defence minister, you can quickly fix this by simply opting not to do it.

The SANDF’s role as the police-with-teeth needs to end, or it needs to receive whatever the police’s budget is for this instead. Soldiers are meant to defend the nation from internal and external threats, not chase fence-jumping undocumented migrants or guard mineshafts in freezing containers.

It might be tempting to take on these tasks to maintain “usefulness” by the government. And there may well be occasion for the military to intervene in assisting the police. But this relationship has now become abusive, and it’s time to pack bags and leave it.

Take heart. The position of defence minister does not need to be an arduous quest resulting in outright quiet-quitting by you and your staff. Think of it as a ministry that has sunk to rock bottom, and any kind of effort at improvement would be a step in the right direction.

These steps are relatively easy to achieve in a political sense. They just require a bit of delegation, ministerial staff who won’t eat the crayons, and a thick skin to take all the inevitable criticism.

Our budget is minuscule, but there are many countries across the globe that have done amazing things with similar figures. You might need to sell off some equipment, and forcefully retire some of the old and lame from the upper ranks, but all of this is very doable. DM

John Stupart is Daily Maverick’s newsletter editor. He is the co-founder of the African Defence Review. He holds a master's degree in War Studies from King’s College, London.

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.


Comments

D'Esprit Dan Jul 14, 2024, 09:42 AM

I think the best way Motshekga can improve the defence force, based on her track record, is to resign with immediate effect and never return to politics.

Heinrich Holt Jul 14, 2024, 01:37 PM

She will first have to be able to read for meaning to get the message.

louw.nic Jul 15, 2024, 03:37 PM

She is the poster person for "failing upwards" Unfortunately, failing in military terms means death, literally.

Christopher Bedford Jul 14, 2024, 10:10 AM

The impression I have is that the most serious threat the current "defence" force could repel would perhaps be a half-dozen untrained teenage soldiers with un-maintained Ak 47s and limited ammunition. As for anything coming from the sea - please, the "navy" is a total joke, not even fit to be called a coast guard. If South Africa is to continue to keep an actual defence force then yes, a total review is required. But honestly, what the hell for? I say sell the assets and abolish the entire structure, from top to bottom. Replace it with a Peace Corps of some description, mostly focused on providing health care and security in under-served areas. Imagine the benefits of having the kind of budget the SANDF currently has, spent on rural and township clinics, infrastructure and housing. BTW the photo of a Naval commander with one loose anklet captioned "soldier" reflects poorly on the Navy but worse on DM's depth of defence force knowledge.

Theo Butler Jul 14, 2024, 10:58 AM

The "anklet" is called a "gaiter". Stop nonsense events such as the annual "Women's Month" parade as it is a waste of money. A further saving could come from decommissioning ships that do not go to sea but still retain a crew with a "Captain" - at least two frigates as well as SAS PROTEA and SAS DRAKENSBERG.

gfogell Jul 14, 2024, 12:13 PM

...And there's the submarines that aren't seaworthy because they hit the bottom by accident when commanded by inadequately trained or experienced commanders/captains. Why do we actually need subs? To sneak up on illegal fishing boats in our waters? It's not like we can afford to launch a torpedo at one right now. How many naval vessels actually fully seaworthy yet have a full crew that is effectively shore-based because the vessel cannot be deployed? Review the country's real needs to defend our coastal waters effectively, and perform effective search and rescue operations and leave it there.

Jonathan Dugas Jul 15, 2024, 12:15 PM

Love the idea of a Peace Corps, but let's also focus effort where we need it---our coastal borders. Scrap the navy because we don't have any military threats by sea, but we desperately need a Coast Guard who can ward off poachers and fishing vessels from our protected areas, not to mention perform rescue operations.

Jonathan Dugas Jul 15, 2024, 12:19 PM

Is Angie really so politically powered up that Cyril can't just dismiss her and replace her with someone who will fulfill his political needs for support in the cabinet? I mean I know it's the ANC but I was hoping we could start to move beyond the whole rewarding failure approach.

PETER BAKER Jul 14, 2024, 10:56 AM

Our SA Defense Force is a really a joke, and the likes of this Motshekga person, who singlehandedly destroyed education in this country, is now ready to, in a similar fashion run her new department into a rat hole. What was el Presidente Ramaphoria thinking about when he placed this ministerial miscreant into this new Adventureland??....we shall never know.....just idiocy all round.

PETER BAKER Jul 14, 2024, 10:56 AM

Our SA Defense Force is a really a joke, and the likes of this Motshekga person, who singlehandedly destroyed education in this country, is now ready to, in a similar fashion run her new department into a rat hole. What was el Presidente Ramaphoria thinking about when he placed this ministerial miscreant into this new Adventureland??....we shall never know.....just idiocy all round.

Old Man Jul 14, 2024, 11:24 AM

Well done, not even a comment about: 1. The corrupt arms deal with Jacob Zuma. 2. Also, charges against Mapisa-Nqakula are 12 counts of corruption under Preca (Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act) and one of money laundering under Poca (Prevention of Organised Crime Act) for allegedly soliciting a R4.5 million from a DEFENCE contractor. 3. Suspected murder of Major Tolla Pieterse (46) in Congo. Some major decisions have to be made by Angie.

Rob Wilson Jul 14, 2024, 11:24 AM

It would be interesting to see a comparison between the defence budget in 1989 with the current one in todays terms, and see what we get done with it. We don't have a border war going on, but the threat to our marine natural resources is bigger than ever, our borders are long and full of holes and we are clearly not able to deal with any well organised insurrection.

G C Jul 14, 2024, 11:32 AM

I dont think the army can tell the politicans, no, we arent going to police South Africa.

Lindsey Kann Jul 14, 2024, 11:57 AM

Thank you for telling us like it is. Do you think she will heed your advice?????

mariajohan19 Jul 14, 2024, 11:59 AM

Forget it Johan Stupard. This cadre can not fix anything, least of all one of the most failed departments of them all. What is CR thinking, for heavens sake?

D'Esprit Dan Jul 14, 2024, 05:13 PM

Survival. And he doesn't actually care about our military. For Ramaphosa, thr utility of the military is to do nice parades at the opening of parliament.

Lewis Gerber Jul 14, 2024, 12:17 PM

It may be of interest for John Stupart to check the ratio of Generals/Admirals to other ranks in the SANDF. I believe the Swiss Army has a ratio of 1 General to 15,000 other ranks. The British 1 to 11,000 the Americans 1 to 8,000. The SANDF has about 1 General/Admiral for about 350 t0 450 other ranks! That's about 150 Generals/Admirals for 70,000 troops. We have More Admirals than boats, More Generals than planes! The SANDF structure and staffing is not fit for purpose. A tiny sharp end and a huge bloated back end (like our current Cabinet) is unworkable and totally disfunctional. It is probably worth checking the validity of these ratios but I don't think they are far off the mark.

M D Fraser Jul 15, 2024, 03:58 PM

I made a similar comment to this in the article about SAPS and Mchunu. The SANDF and SAPS (and others) have simply been employment opportunities for connected ANC cadres. Top-heavy hardly describes it, except of course if one is considering intelligence, competence and ability. Then the braided many are very 'light headed' indeed. Look at the expression on Angie's face. A picture truly is worth a thousand words.

M D Fraser Jul 15, 2024, 03:58 PM

I made a similar comment to this in the article about SAPS and Mchunu. The SANDF and SAPS (and others) have simply been employment opportunities for connected ANC cadres. Top-heavy hardly describes it, except of course if one is considering intelligence, competence and ability. Then the braided many are very 'light headed' indeed. Look at the expression on Angie's face. A picture truly is worth a thousand words.

Darren Olivier Jul 16, 2024, 08:18 PM

The SANDF's general-to-troop ratio is approximately 1:300. That's not far off that of the Australian Defence Force, another mid-sized force with a wide range of conventional capabilities, at 1:350. The South African Army has a similar troop to general ratio as the British Army. I don't have the Swiss figures at hand, but I do know that they have at least 15 000 officers and +- 95 000 soldiers. Given those numbers I don't see how 1:15000 is rmeotely possible. The reason the SANDF is top-heavy is, like most forces designed with a conventional core and designed to expand rapidly with reserves, it has a number of structures that are partially staffed in peacetime. Those still need permanent command staff, specialist personnel, etc. However, with the severe and persistent level of underfunding experienced by the SANDF that hasn't really borne out, and instead the regular force is overused and the reserves are so underfunded as to not be nearly what's needed for that kind of model to work. So it is perhaps time for a defence review to rethink the current structure and get rid of a number of posts. But it's never as simple as 'too many generals'. Those posts were created for a reason, based on a carefully designed force structure meant to be responsive to the future needs of the SANDF.

Lynn Wood Jul 14, 2024, 02:08 PM

A review is an absolute necessity with proper risk assessment undertaken. Somewhere a 4th branch of defence needs to be created, that is Cyber Security. I cannot envisage a scenario where any foreign power is going to actually perform a physical invasion. However a cyber attack is quite likely, especially one that may work with local partners to overthrow existing democratically elected by subterfuge.

Roly Boardman Jul 14, 2024, 02:18 PM

Appointing this person as Minister of Defence is an insult to the people os SA!

Maj.kno Jul 14, 2024, 03:03 PM

How soon before the rank of General is bestowed on her, and which array of unearned medals will soon adorn a non service uniform?

Darren Olivier Jul 16, 2024, 08:21 PM

It won't happen. None of South Africa's post-1994 defence ministers have adopted a military general's rank or received medals, and there's no mechanism for it to happen. One of the things to be pleased with is that South Africa has always followed global best practice with this and with civilian control of the military overall, rather than the performative uniform-wearing we've seen with, for instance, Russia.

District Six Jul 14, 2024, 04:49 PM

Just please keep the minister away from camo berets, fatigues and medals.

D'Esprit Dan Jul 14, 2024, 05:11 PM

Appointing Angie 'Verwoerd' Motshekga as Defence Minister is a deadly slap in the face to our military. But the couch stuffer doesn't care.

John Cawood Jul 15, 2024, 07:11 AM

The attitude, discipline and 'paraatheid' is probably well displayed in the Durban Deep photo. Ready for action on a foot patrol, Audie Murphy at no5 has it all. He has his shades on to limit his vision, also to clamp his bush hat over his ears to limit audio input. His webbing is worn like a brassiere so that he would lie on his spare magazines and have to lift himself off the dirt to change out. He has a string tied to something in his pocket, maybe his keys? Hopefully they pop out of the pocket easily if he has to lift the rifle for an elevated shot, always assuming that his innovative use of the rifle strap will allow him any right side firing mobility at all. With his sleeves cut off he would be useless on the ground, where a real infantryman would live during a firefight, and he is slowing down for the camera causing No6 and further back to bunch up behind him, making a juicy blob of a target of No's 5 to 8. I cringe.

backerman Jul 15, 2024, 07:29 AM

Angie dressed in military gear is cringeworthy. The stuff nightmares are made of.

Nxumalosiyabonga120 Jul 15, 2024, 11:11 AM

In improving our military equipment, we don't need tanks anymore, we need drones (cheaper drones like Lancet), we need a drone facility and air-defenses, reduce number of useless expendable soldiers. We have witnessed in Ukraine how warfare has changed in 21st century, numbers count for nothing anymore. We need quality not quantity.

mariajohan19 Jul 15, 2024, 06:02 PM

This is exactly right but how do you get rid of 150 generals and admirals? Running man got it right: Scrap the navy and convert them to a coast guard. The air force is done anyhow except for a couple of choppers to cart ministers (and generals) around.

Wynand Deyzel Feb 1, 2025, 10:09 AM

The only army trucks that have survived years of abuse, seem to be the old SAMIL units with Magirus Deutz air cooled engines. The SAKOM and Iveco units seem to have all disappeared. Yet, we can be sure the generals all have the latest BMW, Audi, Mercedes Benz an Porche SUV's....

Joe Trainor Trainor Jul 15, 2024, 01:26 PM

Good article! Presented as humour but actually makes a lot of sense. I think perhaps the first thing to do though is to decide, "Why do we have a defence force?" A clear set of answers to this question might go some way towards simplifying Angie's job as boss. Seems to me we need a smallish force to provide border protection, fisheries protection, and not much else. No point in trying to gear up to fight any sort of a war. No point in having high-tech gear like submarines and corvettes and fighter jets. We need patrol boats, maritime patrol aircraft, helicopters, people trained to crew them, and some capable and well-trained soldiers. I would say that's all we need.

Kevin Venter Jul 16, 2024, 07:50 AM

The first and foremost action that she can take to "fix" the defence force is to resign and remove herself from politics altogether. She has no value to add to any arm of government because she has left a generation of children who cannot read for meaning in a country with near on 40% unemployment. She has effectively doomed those same children to a life of crime and hard menial labour just to be able to try and feed themselves and their families. People like her should be the ones who are unemployed.

Wynand Deyzel Feb 1, 2025, 09:58 AM

Let's create more generals, who can play golf, drive shiny cars and earn millions!