Dailymaverick logo

Maverick News

This article is more than a year old

Maverick News

The state of play in SA as campaign electioneering rises to a political crescendo

With a last burst of election rah-rah at rallies this weekend, political parties must hope that they have done enough in this pivotal and hotly contested poll. On Wednesday next week, it’s over to the voters.
The state of play in SA as campaign electioneering rises to a political crescendo

Leaders of political parties have criss-crossed South Africa to hold meetings on street corners in townships, dorpies and cities, led marches against all manner of issues and knocked on doors. It has been an intense campaign, regardless of party colours. 

Pundits have long predicted the governing ANC would drop below 50% and lose its majority, and so coalition talk has tailed the campaigning alongside opposition parties’ determined boosting of their chances at the hustings. 

But the devil is in the details – from geography to voter turnout and voter sentiment. 

The shifting voter outlook has been fundamental to the ANC campaign that has stepped up in intensity in recent weeks. Traditionally that’s how the governing party has galvanised enthusiasm, and thus voting support. That this is working is reflected in ongoing polling that has lifted support for the ANC a handful of percentage points already.  

The possibility that the ANC may just squeak in with 51% can’t be ruled out. It would be a 6.5 percentage point drop from the ANC’s 57.5% support in 2019, which itself was a significant drop from the 62.15% gained in the 2014 elections, according to the Independent Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC). Still, clinching even a 51% majority that allows the ANC to form the next government would be proclaimed as success.

On the campaign trail, personal contact is a proven ANC tactic, as is fielding President Cyril Ramaphosa as point man on the meet-and-greet and on the posters that finally appeared in strategic spots. 

Ramaphosa remains more popular than the ANC itself, and trust in political leadership – the Ramaphosa factor – is a crucial determinant in voters’ choices in research recently released by the University of Johannesburg’s Centre for Social Development in Africa. 

But the ANC’s election support aims are misguided, and modest. 

Much of the governing party’s election calculations seem based on offsetting losses in KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng by boosting support to 80% or more in the Eastern Cape, Mpumalanga and Limpopo, according to the leaked audio of April’s National Executive Committee election meeting. 

But an election analysis shows the ANC has never hit 80% support in the Eastern Cape, getting close only in 2004 with 79.27%. The last time the ANC hit 80% plus in Mpumalanga and Limpopo was in 2009 - 85.55% in Mpumalanga and 84.8% in Limpopo, according to the IEC. 

Since then, their support has consistently dropped in those identified key provinces, as in others. Contributing factors include ANC factional battles, increasing corruption in government, and State Capture, while basic service delivery from water and sanitation to effective community-centred policing has declined. 

The rotational power cuts that have left households and businesses without electricity for up to 12 hours a day in Stage 6 load shedding also helped turn sentiment negative.

The 2024 elections, different to previous ones, have emphasised provincial dynamics. Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal have emerged as potential kingmakers.  

But while Gauteng dynamics that have already brought the ANC young Turks under Premier Panyaza Lesufi together with the EFF are likely to be limited to South Africa’s economic heartland, KwaZulu-Natal dynamics could significantly impact the national scene. 

That’s partly because the IFP has already indicated its willingness to participate in a government of national unity. This opens the door to an ANC-IFP deal, particularly if the ANC nationally comes in below 47% support, which would be too little to take control with just a handful of pliant one- or two-seat parties. 

In this scenario, the IFP’s estimated 6% polling would ensure a rather uncomplicated cooperative coalition arrangement in both KwaZulu-Natal and nationally that would put the ANC in the lead. 

The IFP has nostalgic ties to the KwaZulu-Natal premiership, and previously from 1999 the ANC accommodated this, even though it won the province. 

The impact of the MK party headed by ex-president Jacob Zuma remains to be seen. Whether the party’s leadership battles have dented support will unfold on election day, but Zuma has been a pull factor in the ethnic vote in KwaZulu-Natal – when he was ANC president support shot up to 62.9% in 2009 and 64.5% in 2014, but dropped back to 54.2% in 2019, according to IEC statistics.

Initial polling put the MK party around 20 percentage points, similar to the ANC and IFP in KwaZulu-Natal, with EFF support stalling. 

The IFP taking its polling support into a government of national unity with the ANC would in effect render any opposition KwaZulu-Natal government impossible. Among the Multi-Party Charter opposition parties, the IFP is the largest. Without it, the around 40% combined charter support would significantly drop, making an opposition government most likely out of reach.  

But that impossibility would have been a reality anyway on the back of the DA’s insistence that uMgeni Mayor Chris Pappas be premier. Such hard-line attitudes would not be new. In 2021 a handful of municipalities could have come into opposition control had DA Federal Council Chairperson Helen Zille, who led negotiations, not insisted the DA had to be in charge as the biggest party, according to political insiders. 

While the DA internal polling earlier in 2024 hit 27% nationally, pundits’ estimates of support hovered around 21% to 22%, indicating a lack of significant growth over time.  

The 2024 elections will show the impact of the DA strategy of consolidating the base around strict market liberalism. In a campaign built on fearmongering over a so-called Doomsday ANC-EFF coalition, the DA’s flag-burning advert triggered pushback from among key voting constituencies, including disenchanted ANC voters. 

But Zille, in an interview with Newzroom Afrika broadcast on Tuesday, 21 May, stood by the advert, saying it’s “not gone wrong” for the party. 

The recent University of Johannesburg research on reasons voters chose to cast their ballots the way they do, shows only 24% of respondents said effective governance was the decider. That would indicate the DA motto of where it governs it governs best has not gained the traction needed to shift votes.  

If the DA loses voting support nationally, it must face ditching national leader John Steenhuisen. If not, inevitable accusations of racism would follow as ex-leader Mmusi Maimane was made to fall on his sword when the DA lost 1.46% support in the 2019 elections.  

But anything better than the 20.7% support of 2019 will have the DA claiming success, even if its opposition coalition Moonshot Pact is shot down.


Election day resources




Somewhere in all this, Rise Mzansi is being closely watched as a rising political newcomer. Smaller political parties like the Freedom Front Plus and national elections debutante ActionSA must find their feet. 

The Patriotic Alliance relies on ballots actually being cast by its targeted voting base, working-class voters from Cape Town’s Mitchells Plain, to Westbury in Johannesburg, and to the northern parts of Nelson Mandela Bay Metro.

In South Africa’s 30th year of constitutional democracy, amid tough socioeconomic circumstances, deepening inequality and tumultuous global geopolitics, the 2024 elections test everyone as never before. DM

Read more in Daily Maverick: Elections 2024

Comments

Denise Smit May 23, 2024, 06:15 AM

This is only about all the bad points of the DA and not at all about other parties. Your last attempt at a screw into the coffin. And according to you it is still a white party with old grudges against it amplified by you. You did not read your own article in which it was revealed that only 4 out of 40 DA leaders are white

Peter Theunissen May 23, 2024, 08:03 AM

In spite of their good governance record, the DA are unfortunately a spent force. It could have been different, but with Helen Zille and John Steenhuisen still around they are going nowhere. The election results will show this.

William Kelly May 23, 2024, 08:31 AM

Spot on. The DA have an optics problem that they refuse to recognise and until they do they will stagnate, bleat and moan. Their young mayors however are excellent. They need to takeover and correct the optics which means self sacrifice.

Glyn Morgan May 23, 2024, 08:34 AM

Are you happy with bad governance?

Paddy Ross May 23, 2024, 11:46 AM

It is almost unbelievable that good governance resonates with only 24% of respondents. Admit it or not, too many SA voters are politically immature.

Carol Green May 23, 2024, 02:47 PM

Glyn, it seems to me you're missing the point. Many voters want to feel an emotional connection with a political party and the senior (white) leaders of the DA just don't cut it, however well the DA may govern. They (the DA) need leaders who have charisma and people can relate to and want to vote for. Quite frankly, it's an embarrassment that the DA is not able to sweep these elections considering how corrupt, incompetent and useless the ANC is.

Niek Joubert May 23, 2024, 04:30 PM

Like that whining Maimane who was nothing else but ANC lite?

megapode May 23, 2024, 08:44 AM

Funny that the portion of their website that shows their national leadership has 13 names and faces, and only 5 of those faces are non-white. The DA is not a racist party at their core, but they make the task of convincing the majority of people in this country of that, IE getting the votes they need to take power away from the ANC, very difficult.

megapode May 23, 2024, 09:49 AM

Correction. 6 out of 13. Which remains a long way from the stated 36 out of 40. Where does that figure come from?

T'Plana Hath May 23, 2024, 02:16 PM

It was 'extrapolated' from the recent 'Under-45 Club' article. And possibly a crack pipe.

Jan Smith May 24, 2024, 08:51 AM

I agree to a degree. But shouldn't it also be true that the party must represent the people that vote for it currently? All the focus should not be on who you hope would vote for you. And on that basis the DA federal council (or whatever it is called) is close to representative if you wish to use skin colour as the defining factor. I do agree though that if they wish to grow further they need to change it up a bit. But just like quotas in sport at the top level won't help, it has to start with growth from grassroots level. It should happen naturally, not be forced or manipulated just to score a couple more votes.

Sydney Kaye May 23, 2024, 08:44 AM

The problem is that the perception is that they are a white party. And that is what counts since, as the writer says, good governance doesn't feature too much. It may be that only 4 of the 40 leaders are white but the one we see and hear is very white. It beats me how the DA can't see what an electoral disaster he is and how cringeworthy he sounds on the ads. And I'm a DA voter!

Hilary Morris May 23, 2024, 11:02 AM

And a big ditto from me. Well meaning but arrogant and self satisfied, John and Helen do the party no favours.

megapode May 23, 2024, 09:03 AM

Is it just me who noticed that over half of that article is about the ANC? I counted thirty paragraphs. The DA gets its first mention in paragraph 21 and it's last in 27. The only time they touch on the DA and racism is the perpetual one of why Maimane was fired because the party lost share of popular vote (if that's the real reason) why Steenhuisen seems impregnable.

Denise Smit May 23, 2024, 06:20 AM

I see you have a wounded man on your marketing plackard. I would have thought that the scuffle between the EFF and the ANC in Jujudorp where people have been seriously wounded would have been part of the crescendo article. Too which measures the parties go to cut each other out, but no, still the flag

Malcolm McManus May 23, 2024, 07:24 AM

Actually from my vantage point, I have found electioneering rather weak this election compared to the previous election. Certainly I have not witnessed much street electioneering except the odd drive by of the EFF in one bakkie with a loud hailer using rap music and BOSA paying the local robot whoonga beggars to wave flags and give them a BOSA tee shirt for one afternoon. I even noticed street pole posters came on quite late in the fray and not too many of them either. I don't generally watch much of SABC news. It never goes anywhere and 90% of it is always about load shedding and the odd murder etc. I have noticed quite a strong campaign by DA on you tube. Other than that I really haven't seen anything too exciting. A bit of a damp squib. Id be interested to hear other readers views and experiences here. Perhaps its because I don't indulge in social media such as facebook and twitter. But this is my honest observation and experience.

Jan Smith May 24, 2024, 10:08 AM

I went on a cross country trip recently with my wife, and we tried to see as many of the smaller towns in the country as we could, from Free State to the Eastern Cape, through the Western Cape and coming back to Gauteng through the Northern Cape. And it was striking how few ANC poster there were. Almost none of the towns had any ANC posters. The DA had the most by far, and second was between ActionSA, VF+ and the EFF. My thoughts are that the ANC has just completely given up on trying to win votes in areas where they aren't strong, and it was similar with the EFF, though not as clearly. But the EFF only had posters up in the towns with large informal or township settlements like Cradock or Oudshoorn.

Glyn Morgan May 23, 2024, 08:33 AM

Not one mention of the record of service delivery of the DA! Leaving that out of the DM articles is not what elections are about. What counts for The People? Yabba yabba or service delivery? Please get honest!

megapode May 23, 2024, 09:05 AM

Local government elections are about service delivery. National elections are about the people who going to debate and pass laws.

District Six May 24, 2024, 12:46 AM

Glyn missed the part where only 24%, according to UJ research, vote on service delivery issues. It's typical of DA apologists who double down and refuse to see what is right in front of them. They live in their own reality. Rather than updating their message in the face of evidence, they bang on about why they are right. Take the flag burning thing. They just can't see it. Take Steenhuizen. Zille. The "Uranus Pact", uhm Moonthing. Whatever. Shooting into one's own foot is an art form in the DA. Because "everyone else is wrong." The result is they are shedding votes to the right. They are shedding votes to the PA, IFP, ASA, BOSA, and RiseMzansi. What should have happened is they should have kept these splitters inside the DA. Now, they're trying to claw back something they lost with a pathetic "moonshot pact". In any event, Steenhuizen takes pot-shots at this Pact, at every opportunity. Go figure). DA has one job: to take votes from a thoroughly corrupt ANC. Guys. You're not losing elections to the corrupt ANC. You're just losing. Everyone is telling you why you are losing. You DA guys are just too clever. Coz it's the stupid voters, right, and everyone else is wrong? Like Aunty Merle says, Ooh eh eh eh.

megapode May 24, 2024, 09:36 AM

I would think that for a lot of South Africans, a roof over their heads and food on their tables are the number one considerations. Service delivery is not unimportant, but when you don't have a job or are working at minimum wage, the cost of living becomes a bigger concern. Service delivery is more important to those like me who live in nice suburbs where the vast majority are either employed or have a decent retirement income, but that's not the lot of many South Africans.

Sydney Kaye May 23, 2024, 08:57 AM

"Somewhere in all this, Rise Mzansi is being closely watched as a rising political newcomer". I keep reading this, but on what evidence, when the polling shows negligible support. Unless you mean 1% which in our flawed PR system would mean 4 seats in Parliament.

megapode May 23, 2024, 09:09 AM

I agree with your numbers as regards RM, though they may surprise if the social media mud slung their way (including by clueless political party leaders with comprehension problems) doesn't stick. But the PR system has many good aspects. It completely eliminates gerrymandering and also parties holding power despite having a minority of the popular vote. Both of those factors have been significant in the history of this country's parliament.

Geoff Coles May 23, 2024, 09:49 AM

It's a great pity it is the Party Leaderships that control, almost entirely, who are going to be the MP's..... in that sense PR suits them.

megapode May 23, 2024, 10:54 AM

No system is perfect. It was big news recently in the UK when some guy who'd been kicked out by the Tories won his old seat back. But he didn't even have a majority of local support. The UKIP party there tended to do well on the popular vote but never actually win a seat. Under PR they'd have had about 13% of the Commons. Which system better represents the desires of the voters?

Sydney Kaye May 23, 2024, 11:41 AM

I was referring to there being no no minium to gain a seat. Say 3%. At least.

megapode May 23, 2024, 03:13 PM

Under such a rule, the DP would not have taken any seats in Parliament after the 1994 election. We need to remember that parties have to start somewhere, and that a small start may lead to something greater. This, by the way, is why I get fed up with the DA's repeated moaning that a vote for a "small party" is wasted. Really? So we should have given up on their liberal parent party 30 years ago?

megapode May 23, 2024, 09:22 AM

It's interesting that the only signs of campaigning where I live, in a nice middle class DA safe seat, have been posters on polls. Clearly the battle ground is elsewhere - where the bulk of voters live.

megapode May 23, 2024, 12:38 PM

Ahem! "posters on POLES". By which I mean things embedded in the ground and with a light, road sign, and/or cables at the top.

T'Plana Hath May 23, 2024, 03:12 PM

I was about to say! I haven't seen this many 'polls' abused since the Second World War.

Malcolm McManus May 24, 2024, 09:50 AM

Yes Bob, I have noticed the same thing, and much the same where I work in Durban. Also the posters seem to have been put up very late in the election, but certainly a lack of on the ground campaigning. I just saw somebody walk past with a poster. Perhaps to patch up his shack with or for firewood. Who knows. But as long as it gets put to good use.

Rae Earl May 23, 2024, 09:31 AM

The ANC is a hotbed of bad governance and corruption. The EFF is as corrupt and is highly racist to boot. The MK is in essence, a combination of these two parties in its membership type and structure based on a manifesto of epic insanity. So why DM, denigrate the DA? It is imperfect for sure, but we desperately need an antidote to the septic elements ingrained in the ANC, EFF, and MK parties. Chasing possible DA voters away is, quite simply suicidal, apart from being disgustingly acquiescent of the chronic failures of parties in opposition to them.

Geoff Coles May 23, 2024, 09:45 AM

Usual knocks at the DA though not this time from the usual DM suspects.....you too Marianne

Johan Buys May 23, 2024, 10:12 AM

Citizens deserve the leaders they elect. An article estimated from those that were decided and would say, 42% ANC + 11% EFF + 10% MK. If that is true then two out of every 3 South Africans are complete idiots and we as a country deserve to suffer the consequences. 2024 is last roll of the dice - if those three govern there will be nothing left to vote about in 2029. The other third need to pull out all their stops and get people out to vote. It would be tragic if turnout continues to slip. Not voting is as bad for SA as voting for ANC/EFF/MK is.

Kenneth FAKUDE May 23, 2024, 05:18 PM

Unfortunately the people who understand the dynamics of running a country successfully will never make a majority vote. Voters who identify with popularity and unattainable promises are the majority voters. Those parties don't need a governance record because they have non but they put less effort than the DA, until the identity falls in the range popular with the radical masses the DA will stand a chance. Perhaps being more vocal about inequality and land will piss off existing voters but it will resonate with the missing numbers. It is not like those parties promising to solve these two issues have a clue anyway believe me.

Malcolm McManus May 24, 2024, 10:01 AM

Not voting is a hell of a lot better for SA than voting for ANC/EFF/MK

fredabrodi May 23, 2024, 10:17 AM

I concur with the readers who have pointed out the negative of the DA. I live in Kzn, and Chris Pappas is the correct choice for Kzn Premier. He has shown he can govern, he speaks the language, and the campaign is going well. The Doomsday prediction is real ! The Anc has dismally failed the people of SA, hence signing the NHI into law against all advice. The MK party support in Kzn is huge, if you can believe the push for it on X. So if the SA citizens don’t care about service delivery, then they shouldn’t protest after the elections. Just in, Anc support 44% and the DA 26%, nationally, but it does change all the time.

megapode May 23, 2024, 11:01 AM

Well those figures could lead to an ANC/DA coalition, which would not be the worst possible outcome. The MPC is a bust. The member parties are already taking potshots at each other, clearly have different ideas of whe the document they all signed actually means, and really only the DA out of the MPC parties can confidently expect double-digit figures. Besides, we've seen in Johannesburg how these multi-party coalitions work in reality - which is spending most of their time squabbling and then making up again, and not a lot of time actually running the City. I'm not keen to see that repeated at national level.

fredabrodi May 23, 2024, 11:47 AM

I agree, and the people of Jhbg urgently need service delivery. But again, most of SA need service delivery.

Jane Crankshaw May 23, 2024, 11:57 AM

A coalition with the ANC might save both the DA and the ANC - would be a combination of good governance, Biz SA and ANC numbers!

Colin Braude May 23, 2024, 07:42 PM

Cde Marriane you are entitled to your own opinions but not your own facts. As a journalist, you should know that "Mmusi Maimane was made to fall on his sword" is a lie — there is no other description. Mmusi appointed a panel to review the DA's performance under his leadership (he lost the growth momentum that Zille as leader has established) and resigned as a result of its criticism; there was no vote or drive to force him out. Others have commented upon your bias; suffice to say that if Daily Maverick does not up its game, it will not be blank for one day but permanently.

megapode May 24, 2024, 09:44 AM

I'm fascinated by the way our self-moderation process works. We're asked to keep it civil and truthful, but I wonder how those criteria are interpreted. I made a comment at 9:53 yesterday. It contained no personal attacks, no profanities and I did not get into conspiracy theory territory. I've received no warnings about it, but it remains unliked and thus being deemed by the masses here as either uncivil or as misinformation. The first sentence is "I think DM’s reputation for being anti-DA is overcooked.". That gets vetoed whilst other stuff gets through. Really? Come on guys, play the game. I OK posts presented to me even if I don't agree with them as long as they meet those two criteria.

Bryan Bailey May 24, 2024, 11:35 AM

What I find extremely annoying is that this election is about SAVING (read Rescue if you like) SA Inc from the 30 years of ANC misrule. The, across the board, Media have the power of influence to help steer the people (read the voters) in a new direction, not supporting any political party. That journalists obtain degrees in journalism allows them to put words in clever ways which stop supporting any political party. That the Media and comments of people castigating certain parties especially the DA is mind boggling. Steenhuizen and Zille maybe white and leaders, is irrelevant as they are NOT, the DA, maybe the face the the party and has more black people than white. Of all the opposition parties, they are the "biggest" and based on the running Western Cape are the closest to being able to run SA Inc which the ANC has proven they CAN'T, together with the MPC (Multi Party Charter). Politics is a dirty game and every party wants to rule. Once the results are out, then bartering begins. If the DA is a spent force as claimed and with optic problems, it's easy for arm chair critics to make such statements without offering alternatives. Will we ever get away with race as the basis of life? Business is profit and having merit based staff and should apply to government, which it does not and hence Cadres, BBBBE, etc, we will NEVER succeed. Finally, a fact of life is that not everybody can be leaders and is no point if you can't get your way, run away and form your own party.